MORNING SESSSION

CCPCJ 1st VICE-Chair: Annotated Agenda. As you can see, it is proposed that the session today will address Item 4 on strategic management, budgetary, and administrative questions. As a joint meeting we are CND. Any outstanding elections for the FINGOV Bureau for 2024 will happen under that item as agreed upon by the Extended Bureau. Other actions under this agenda item will be taken by the Commissions at the separate meetings tomorrow. The meeting of the CND will be at 10am-1pm and the meeting of the CCPJ from 3-6pm.  As also agreed upon by the Extended Bureau, we will also open the discussion on ECOSOC matters, Agenda Item 9 for CND and Agenda Item 10 for CCPCJ. In order to make the best use of our time, these agenda items will remain open and deliberations will continue in their respective meetings tomorrow. Tomorrow afternoon, the Commission will resume agenda Item 4 in order to take action on the budget resolution and the FINGOV Bureau for 2024-25. Thereafter, the Commission will continue deliberations on other agenda items as follows: under Agenda Item 6, the CCPCJ is expected to take action on the nomination of two candidates for membership on the board of trustees of the UN Interregional Crime and Justice Institute. Information is contained in document…The CCPCJ will also be informed on the follow up to the 14th Crime Congress in preparation for the 15th Crime Congress, Agenda Item 9 and we will continue discussions on our contributions to the work of ECOSOC, under Agenda Item 10, as well as the provisional Agenda for the next session, which falls under Agenda Item 11. Under Agenda item 12 of the business, the Commission is expected to take action on document, entitled, “Participation of the EU in the work of the Commission,” which was tabled by Czechia on behalf of the state members of the UN that are members of the EU. A mirror decision has been tabled by Poland on behalf of the states members of the UN that are members of the EU, for consideration by the CND. I understand that Agenda Item 11 of CND will be open this afternoon, during which the text as revised after informal consultations will be introduced and considered, which will then facilitate action within the CCPCJ. Following considerations of Agenda Item 12, we will then adopt the report on the 33rd Session, Agenda Item 13. Thereafter, the 33rd Session will be closed and the 34th Session will be open for the sole purpose of electing the Bureau of the Commission in accordance with ECOSOC Resolution 2003-31 and Rule 15 of the Rules of Procedure of the Functional Commissions. Dear delegates, can we agree on the proposed organization of work? I see no comments from the floor so it is so decided.  I would also like to remind you, as was the case for the session in May, this reconvened session will be paperless.

Chair: Pleased to welcome youto the reconvening of the 67th session of CND. I’ll now invite members of CND to turn to the agenda. According to the proposed Program of Work, the CND will consider today, joined along with CCPCJ, Agenda Item 4 on strategic management and budget. Any outstanding endorsement for FINGOV Bureau for 2024 will happen under that item as agreed by the Extended Bureau. Other actions under this agenda item will be taken by the Commission tomorrow from 10am-1pm. We will also open Agenda Item 9 on ECOSOC matters this morning to discuss topics of joint interest as agreed by the Extended Bureaus. This afternoon, the Commission will address Agenda Item 5 on the Implementation of Drug Control Items. During this item, it is expected that the WHO will report orally on 47th meeting on the WHO Expert Committee on  Drug Dependence (ECDD) 14th-18th October 2024. The Commission will then consider Item 6 on the implementation of the national, regional, and international levels of commitments as reflected in the  Ministerial Declaration from 2019 to counter the world drug problem. I propose that time permitted, the commission also open other items, namely the provisional agenda for 68th Commission, Item 10, as well as other business, Item 11. Tomorrow morning, the commission will resume Agenda Item 4 to take action on the budget resolution and the FINGOV Bureau for 2025. Thereafter, the Commission will continue deliberations on all other agenda items, namely 5, 6, 9, 10, 11. The Commission is expected to take action on a [x] entitled, “Participation of the EU in the Work of the Commission,” which was tabled by Poland on behalf of the state members of the UN that are part of the EU. Subsequently, the Commission will adopt the report of the reconvened session, Item 12. After the 67th session is closed, as is customary, the 68th session will be open for the election of the Bureau of that session. Can the CND adopt its agenda and its proposed program of work for this session. I see no objection; it’s so decided. I’d also like to remind you that as was the case for the session in March, this reconvened session will be conducted fully paperless. On strategic management, budgetary, and administrative questions, as already mentioned, we will now begin consideration of  Agenda Item 4 on strategic management, budgetary, and administrative questions, includes the following subitems: a.) Work on Intergovernmental Working Group on improving the governance and financial situation of UNODC, b.) the directives on policy and budgetary issues for the UN CCPCJ, c.) working […] of the Commission, d.) staff composition of UNODC and other related matters. In order to make efficient use of our time, we’ll cover all sub items together. Speakers should indicate which sub items they will cover in their statements. The Commissions are expected to jointly consider the implementation of the consolidated biennial budget of 2024-25 for the UNODC, as contained in the report of the Executive Director. The Commission will also take into consideration a Conference Room Paper on the Drug Proposed Program for 2026 and Program Performance for 2024 for UNODC. At a separate meeting tomorrow, the CND is expected to formally adopt a draft resolution on the implementation of the budget for biennium for 2024-25 for the fund of the International Drug Control Program and endorse the Members of the Bureau of FINGOV for 2025. Furthermore, the Commissions have for consideration the report of the Executive Director on Gender Balance and Geographical Representation within UNODC. With this I now give the floor to the Vice-Chair.

CCPCJ 1st VICE-Chair: I would like to recall that the CCPCJ have its separate meeting tomorrow afternoon and also take formal action on the draft resolution on the implementation of the budget for the biennium 2024-25 for the UN Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Fund and endorse the members of the Bureau FINGOV for 2025. I now call on UNODC’s division for management to introduce the report on implementation of the consolidated budget for the biennium 2024-25 for UNODC as well as the report of the Executive Director on Gender Balance and Geographic Representation within UNODC.

UNODC Division of Management: Under Agenda Item B, I am pleased to introduce the report on the implementation of the consolidated budget for 2024-25 for UNODC, which represents adjustments to the consolidated budget for the biennium 2024-25. Building on its global vision and expertise, as well as its wide-filled presence, UNODC continues to implement its strategy from 2021-25 and support member states in confronting threats linked to its mandate area. From 2024-25, program delivery is projected at 777 million dollars, an increase of 5.8% compared to the initial budget of 734.2 million dollars. Consequently, the estimate for program support cost income, a derivative of program execution, has been adjusted upward to 74.6 million dollars while expenditure projections have been prudently increased to 73 million dollars. This increase will enable the office to address the immediate needs in corporate initiatives, field office support, and central program and administrative services. The general purpose fund budget has been increased to 9.5 million dollars. It represents zero real growth. The continued imbalance between earmarked and unearmarked resources affects UNODC’s ability to respond rapidly to changing global priorities. To deliver our mandate and to strengthen enablers of development, UNODC remains fully commitment to the UN development system reform and to the UN management reform. Mr. Chair, let me now turn to item d. UNODC continues to promote gender parity and geographical diversity amongst its staff. The annual report of the Executive Director on Gender Balance and Geographical Representation within UNODC provides detailed information on the activities undertaken in these areas. Efforts to sustain gender parity which was at 49% on 31st October, 2024, require ongoing dedication. Currently, UNODC has achieved the gender parity target, established to be between 47% to 53% at all professional and above levels. Consistent efforts towards equitable and geographical representation, which includes strengthened widespread outreach to attract a wide and diverse pool of implicants remains a crucial activity in improving workforce diversity. Additionally, it remains a top priority to ensure healthy workforce in a conducive and enabling work environment. To achieve this, we are encouraging managers to implement a victim-centered approach and to role-model the organization’s zero tolerance policy against any form of prohibitive conduct, including sexual misconduct, as well as discrimination, harassment, and abuse of authority.

UNODC Public Affairs and Policy Support Branch: I would like to introduce the proposed program plan for 2026 and program performance for 2024. We would like to thank delegates that provided comments to an early version that was presented to FINGOV on 21st November, 2024. The new document addressed these comments. Just to recall on how and why the reconvened session has to review this document, the regulation and rules governing program aspects of the budget, the monitoring of implementation and evaluation stipulate that the draft document is to be reviewed by the relevant sectoral, functional, and regional intergovernmental bodies. If possible, during the regular cycle of their meetings, prior to their review by the Committee for Program and Coordination, the ECOSOC Council, and the General Assembly. Just to recall also the process on what happens after the Commission reviews this document. Once the Commission has reviewed and provided comments to the document, it will be submitted to the UNODC Executive Director for approval before submitting to the Program Planning and Budget Division of the Department of Management in New York. This division in turn presents it to the Committee on Program and Coordination (CPCC) in May next year. The CPCC is the main subsidiary organ of the ECOSOC Council and the General Assembly for planning, programming, and coordination. In parallel, the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Requests needs to consider the 2026 draft budget which is based upon the draft plan. Both the CPCC and the Advisory Committee on Admin & Budgetary Requests then provide their recommendations to the fifth Committee which in turn recommends a reconsolidated 2026 program plan for adoption by the general assembly at the end of 2025. At this advanced stage of the document, if you have any further comments we invite you to submit to UNODC by Thursday 12, December.

CCPCJ 1st VICE-Chair: Now we will turn to the part of the item in relation to the work of the working group on governance and finance (FINGOV).

Chair: Since January 2024 to date, the working group has held four regular meetings, two rounds of informal consultations on drug budget resolutions and dialogue with the Executive Director of UNODC. The Commission has before it for its consideration and not by the Secretariat on the work of the working group. Before we open the discussion, I would like to inform you that following the departure of Ambassador [x] the group of Western European and other States have nominated Ambassador Anita Malkovich of Sweden for the position of Vice-chair for FINGOV for the remainder of 2024. As…meeting on 2nd October 2024, the Extended Bureau was informed on the nomination from the group of Western European and other States. Can the CND endorse this nomination? I see none. It’s so decided.

CCPCJ 1st VICE-Chair: Following the departure of Ambassador Monterrubio of Spain, the Extended Bureau of the Commission had its seventh meeting on 7 October was informed of the nomination  from the group of Western European and Other States of Anita Malkovich of Sweden for the position of Vice Chair of FINGOV for the remainder of the 2024 period. Can CCPCJ also endorse the nomination of Anita Malkovich of Sweden for that position, as just endorsed by the CND. Without objection, it is so decided. I congratulate Anita Malkovich of Sweden with the endorsement of her election by both Commissions. I would like to recall that the Commissions are expected to endorse at the time of this reconvened session the members for the FINGOV bureau for 2025, following the joint nomination by the Bureau of the CND and CCPCJ. This will be carried out in the respective separate meetings of the Commissions in the morning and afternoon. I am pleased to inform you that the Secretariat has received the following nominations, which have also been before the Extended Bureau of CND and CCPCJ and are being jointly nominated pursuant to ECODOC decision 2022/1316 (e). Eastern European Group, position of Chair- Ambassador of Albania tomorrow. Latin American and Caribbean position of first Vice-Chair, Ambassador Laura Gil, permanent representative of Colombia. Western European and Other States Group position of Vice-Chair, Ambassador Anita Malkovich, permanent representative of Sweden. As mentioned before, both Commissions will be asked to take action on the nominations in separate meetings tomorrow. The Secretariat by yesterday evening had not received nominations of Vice-Chair by African Group and the position of Vice-Chair by the Asia-Pacific Group. Once nominations have been received, they will be brought before the Extended Bureaus of the CND and CCPCJ in accordance with ECOSOC decision 2022/316. I would now like to invite Ambassador Laura of Colombia, Vice Chair of the FINGOV in 2024 to report on the work of the working group.

Colombia: I’d like to read the following: I have the pleasure to inform you about the work of the standing open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group on improving the governance and financial situation of UNODC. In my capacity as Vice-Chair of the working group. Information on the work of the working group is included in document [link is shared aloud]. During the period covered by the report, the working group held 3 regular meetings, which covered a broad range of issues concerning the governance and financial situation of the office. Another regular meeting, not included in the report was held on 21st and 22nd November. During that meeting the WG discussed, under the operational part, the implementation of the UNODC strategy, the offices efforts to enhance organizational arrangements for intergovernmental meetings, the implementation biennial consolidated budget, 2026 program plan, and 2024 program performance for  UNODC, and evaluation. Under the programmatic part: FINGOV received comprehensive updates on the work taken up by the office in three regions: Africa, the Middle East, Europe, Western and Central Asia, and the Pacific. In addition, the WG held informal consultations on October 22 and 29 2024 on draft resolutions contained in the report of the Executive Director on the implementation of the consolidated budget for biennium 2024-25 for UNODC. A large number of delegations attended the meetings. On behalf of Ambassador H, who as active chair of FINGOV has chaired informal consultations, I’d like to thank member states for their active and constructive participation. The Secretariat prepared an updated version of the FINGOV guide. The guide explains the work and structure of FINGOV and provides a generic introduction into the substantive elements under the FINGOV purview. The updated version is available online on the secure webpage for member states.

Chair: The CND is also expected to endorse in accordance with ECOSOC decision 2022/316 e during its session tomorrow morning the three nominations for the 2025 FINGOV Bureau, which have already been placed before the Extended Bureau of the CND and CCPCJ and have been jointly nominated. I now open the floor for comments on Item 4 strategic management, budgetary, and administrative questions. I’d like to remind delegates that interventions by regional groups are limited to 5 minutes and all other interventions 3 minutes each. All sub items considered together, each delegation can make one statement and should state which item is being addressed.

EU: This statement addresses all 4 subjects on the consideration for this agenda item. We recognize the growing importance of FINGOV and encourage further strengthening of this group as a key forum for communication and dialogue between member states and the UNODC secretariat. The presentations and discussions in FINGOV have been efficient and useful. They have helped raise our collective awareness and understanding of the challenges in an open and transparent manner.  We also welcome the availability of Executive Director G. to participate in regular exchanges with the group and ensure timely and dynamic response to the needs and concerns of States, particularly in times of a rapidly evolving security landscape and other global challenges. We welcome  UNODC’s proposed program plan for 2026 and program performance for 2024, as well as UNODC’s consolidated budget for 2026. We support the budget as presented in the Secretariat’s report. We commend UNODC for its capacity to adjust its programs, approaches, and priorities in the rapidly changing context for addressing drugs, crime, corruption, and terrorism.  We also appreciate UNODC continuously develops its operations, with improved reporting, extensive evaluations, and increased effectiveness. The value of UNODC, within the broader UN system, is well established and does not require further proof. However we are concerned with the current liquidity crisis affecting the UNODC and the UN as a whole. This critical situation not only threatens the financial stability of the Office and its ability to plan activities in the short or medium term. It also undermines its capacity to effectively fulfill its mandate at a time when international cooperation must be strengthened. Also in view of implementing the commitments adopted in the Pact for the Future and accelerating progress towards meeting the goals for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development .New process and instruments which are needed for more effective cooperation to fight drugs and crime, such as the UN Cybercrime Convention, could also result with more tasks for UNODC and should also be anticipated. As a committed partner of UNODC and one of its largest financial supporters, the EU and its member states emphasize the vital importance of ensuring the continuity of UNODC’s missions which are crucial for global security and sustainable development. The financial contribution from the EU institutions to the UNODC amount to 48 million for 2024 alone. We encourage all member states to provide UNODC with adequate resources to undertake its work and in this regard, invite member states to consider further voluntary contributions and to pay their assessed contributions to the UN Regular Budget in full and on time. We reiterate the importance of civil society participation in UNODC activities and we welcome the active efforts to promote gender equality, human rights, child protection, and youth empowerment. UNODC can continue to count on our strong support to address the scourges of crime and drugs. In this context it’s essential that the EU can continue in the work of CND and CCPCJ in accordance with the practice established here in Vienna. Therefore, we’ve tabled draft decisions to ensure the status quo is maintained. We hope to count on every delegations support for their smooth adoption.

United States: My statement addresses Agenda Item 4. We’re grateful to advance our shared efforts through the CND and CCPCJ to counter illicit drugs and strengthen international cooperation to prevent and address transnational crime. The US is working to address the deadliest drug threat in our history. Over the last 25 years, overdose deaths linked to synthetic opioids, including fentanyl, have skyrocketed to over 100 x leves recorded in 1999.  Similarly, fatal overdose involving other substances, such as cocaine and methamphetamine have also risen sharply. This year, I am pleased to report that in the twelve months ending in June, US OD deaths dropped by 14.5% compared to the same period ending in June 2023. This marks the 7th straight month of declines and largest drop recorded in this period. It is also the fourth time in a row we’ve seen decreases in deaths across all major classes of drugs. Thanks to historic investments in public health, our efforts are making a difference. One of our key approaches is an overdose prevention strategy, which addresses four main areas: prevention, harm reduction, evidence based treatment, and recovery support. This strategy helps US direct resources across the continuum of care to lower the number of overdose deaths. In addition to investments in our own public health system, the US has provided more than 158 million dollars to UNODC in 2023 to support UNODC’s narcotics control, crime prevention, and criminal justice work. We strongly support UNODC’s efforts to implement new reforms and results-based management practices and welcome the use of monitoring and evaluation to improve the delivery of UNODC technical assistance and capture best practices and lessons learned. And we continue to support UNODC’s efforts to increase transparency in the administration, operations, and budget processes. We also welcome increased transparency about UNODC’s field operations activity and strongly support FINGOV as an important informal mechanism for member states to communicate directly with the secretariat on management, budgetary, and administrative issues. The US also strongly supports UNODC’s efforts to promote inclusivity, enhance gender balance, and improve geographic representation, strengthening the ability to select candidates based on merit and competence as enshrined in the UN Charter. As we look at what we’ve accomplished together, I appreciated that our delegations joined with experts from civil society, academia, and international organizations from around the world for three productive days this week to discuss the implementation of the Kyoto declaration. We welcomed the opportunity to serve as a panelist on the thematic session on New, Emerging and Evolving forms of Crime and we look forward to continuing our work with a wide range of stakeholders to share information, good practices, and lessons learned in preparation for next years CCPCJ and upcoming regional preparatory sessions for the 2026 Crime Congress.

Russia: I will be speaking to Item 4. Russia supports the efforts of CND, CCPCJ and UNODC to address the world drug problem, to combat transnational organized crime and corruption, and to prevent terrorism. We are an important partner and donor to the Office. Successful examples of our project cooperation include the projects in Central Asia, Pakistan, and Iran. We’ve also had important patronage in the anti-corruption sphere, the UNODC youth initiative, and the youth network and the effort to prevent drug addiction among young people. In our view, the Office’s Project Activities served the interests of all states and will be conducted in strict compliance with the decisions of the relevant intergovernmental bodies. It is important to avoid politicizing the international counter of narcotics and anti-crime cooperation and technical assistance offered by UNODC. There should be equitable access for all entrusted states . When compiling the UNODC project portfolio, prime considerations should be had to the needs and requests of states. In that context, it would be useful to consider ways of reducing UNODC’s reliance on extra budgetary resources, which constitutes 95% of the total budget. As stated in report of the UNODC’s Executive Director’s report on budget implementation for 24-25, this year, yet again, we’ve seen an increase in special purpose funding. This certainly allows UNODC to expand the scope of its project activity however, at the same time, the report acknowledges that as a result, there’s been an increase in UNODC’s dependency on donor priorities and there’s been a reduction in flexibility in our view. These [muffled] the Office’s financial model requires to seek long term and sustainable solutions. The  problem is further exacerbated by the liquidity crisis in the UN regular budget, as a result of which this year we saw constellations of sessions of the Commission’s auxiliary bodies- the meetings of the heads of law enforcement authorities combatting illegal drug trafficking. There were also cuts to interpretation to all UN official languages of the COW during the 33rd session of [muffled]. It’s unacceptable to cut expenditure on compliance with the basic UN principle of multilingualism when it comes to formal sessions of the intergovernmental bodies. The liquidity crisis notwithstanding, we note the thematic distortions in subprogram 2 to address the world drug program. These pertain to  proposed to the proposed program plan for 2026. Despite our repeated request to comprehensively reflect in it UNODC’s tasked in addressing the world drug problem, including law enforcement components, ensuring access to narcotic drugs for scientific and medical purposes and other important aspects. Year in and year out it details only projects on development and public health. We will not be able to defeat the drug problem this way. In regards to gender balance, we’d like to note that this criteria should not become an absolute value in UNODC’s HR policy or supplant such important requirements as professionalism of candidates and geographical representations. Moreover there has been progressive achievements in gender goals in UNODC’s gender goals HR policy, where as equitable geographical representation can hardly be said to prevail if representatives of one regional group occupy more than 50% of professional positions. We urge UNODC to take guidance on this matter from Article 101 of the UN Charter.

Pakistan: This statement addresses Agenda Item 4. Pakistan commends the strategic orientation, operational achievements, and steadfast support provided by UNODC in assisting member states with the effective implementation of UN conventions and policy guidelines. Pakistan also appreciates the work of the Intergovernmental working group, which continues to serve as open dialogue between member states and UNODC, fostering better co-learning and financial stability within the organization. Cochairs, as we all agreed,the intertwined challenges of the world drug problem and transnational organized crime are a global concern. They transcend borders and demand a shared responsibility. I’m pleased to highlight Pakistan’s robust and holistic approach to address these threats. Our approach emphasizes a balanced strategy focusing on both supply and demand reduction, while strengthening regional and international cooperation. Despite the resource constraints, Pakistan remains resolute in its efforts to combat these challenges effectively, contributing to global peace and security. Co-chairs, while addressing these challenges, it is important to ensure that the institutions and states agency tasked with combating them are adequately resources and equitably represented. Co-chairs, as highlighted in the Executive Director’s report, more than 50% of UNODC’s staff come from a single regional group. This stark imbalance undermines the principle of equitable geographical representation enshrined in the Charter. Pakistan firmly believes that the competence is not confined to one regional group. We call on UNODC to intensify its outreach and recruitment efforts in underrepresented regions, ensuring an inclusive representation across all levels of staffing. We would also like to highlight the consolidated budget for 2024-25 shows an 7.4 % increase in special purpose funds to 777 million, yet resource allocation to Western and Central Asia remains disproportionate to the scale of challenges. Western and Central Asia, a region at the frontline of drug trafficking, terrorism, and organized crime receives only 55.3 million.  This allocation is insufficient given the magnitude of issues faced by countries like Pakistan. We urge UNODC to adopt a needs-based approach to social distributions to ensure that nations with most pressing challenges are adequately funded to implement effective and sustainable solutions. Cochairs, while Pakistan acknowledges  the progress made in governance reforms however, the persistent reliance on earmarked funding, which accounts for the majority of the extrabudgetary resources remains a concern. General purpose funds represent a mere 1% of such contributions, severely limiting organizations flexibility to address emerging global priorities. We therefore encourage member states to consider making non earmarked contributions to the UNODC. Cochairs as we discuss these essential governance and funding reforms, we cannot ignore the pressing humanitarian crisis unfolding around the world. We strongly and unequivocally condemn the indiscriminate use of force on civilians in Gaza. Attacks on civilians, civilian [muffled], infrastructure, blockading of food, fuel, and water, as well as forced displacement of people within the Occupied Territory are flagrant violations of international humanitarian law. We urge the international community to advocate, advance a conclusive result-oriented and time-bound peace process through honest and sustained negotiations. We also urge the CCPCJ to include these crimes in its agenda for the future media and prepare a report for further action.

Egypt: This statement is related to Agenda Item 4.  Egypt commends the cooperation of UNODC in supporting sisterly African countries and records in this regard the successful visit of law enforcement and criminal justice officials from Burkina Faso and Niger last July…Distinguished co chairs Egypt recognizes the importance of the proposed program budget for 2026 that addresses the priorities of developing countries in different fields related to preventing and combating crime and attaining criminal justice. While Egypt praises the increases in voluntary contributions  for special purpose which enables UNODC to implement its mandate, we also have to acknowledge that UNODC is still facing financial challenges that affects its ability to fully cover the full scope of its mandate and to address some priorities of member states. Egypt also expresses its concern that the special purpose funding represents more than 90% of extrabudgetary resources, most of it are earmarked and we believe more unearmarked voluntary contributions, which only represents 1 % of the extrabudgetary resources will provide UNODC flexibility in the using for special purpose funding as well as exerting more efforts towards widening the scope of donors will help UNODC in meeting technical assistance requests from member states. Distinguished cochairs, Egypt recognizes the negative effect of the ongoing debate on UN regular budget on the UN office to fill many vacant positions, which if fulfilled would enable the office to fully implement the core programmatic functions for supporting developing countries, including the provision of technical assistance and capacity building to member states. Egypt praises UNODC efforts to ensure gender parity and women’s empowerment in its structure since women represent 49% of the staff and professional degrees. However, while we commend the efforts to address  an equitable geographical representation, Egypt expresses concerns that almost 52% of the staff in professional and higher degrees are from one geographical group. Egypt emphasizes that UNODC’s research work should be based on clear and prior mandates and policy guidance provided by governing bodies. We would also like the emphasize the importance of transparency and regular dialogue and close consultations between all member states in UNODC regarding the ongoing publications of research activities at all stages. Egypt stresses importance the publications of UNODC should be impartial and represent the cultural diversity of member states. Distinguished co-chairs, while we are meeting to enhance international efforts of the realization of our common goal is to prevent and combat crimes and attain justice, Egypt would like to stress that the loss of lives and livelihoods in conflict areas, especially Gaza and the Middle East creates a conducive environment for crimes, including drug use, trafficking of persons, smuggling of migrants, and other forms of transnational crimes. In this regard, Egypt codemns in the stronger possible terms the indiscriminate and inappropriate use of force by Israel in the Palestinian Occupied territories, especially in Gaza, which has led to the deaths of almost 45,000 innocent Palestinians, 70 % of them are women and children. Egypt consider these Israeli acts of aggression in Palestine as a clear violation of international and humanitarian law. Egypt will not tire in working with all parties and all stakeholders to reach a ceasefire and a lasting peace for all, including through the realization of an independent Palestinian state, its capital in East Jerusalem and continues to exert every possible effort in this regard.

Philippines: Our remarks have to do Agend Item 4, particularly subitem d. The Philippines takes note of the Executive Director’s report on gender balance, geographical representation within the the UNODC. My country takes keen interest in the progress on gender balance and gender parity in the UNODC as a strong advocate of women empowerment and gender equality and as cochair of UNODC’s group of friends on gender equality and women empowerment. We know that gender parity targets have not been met at all levels, as reflected in the report. The Philippines acknowledges the difficulty of this task and encourages the UNODC to double its efforts in order to reach its target. The Philippines acknowledges the UNODC’s efforts that benefit women and their families in the organization, including flexible working arrangements, parental and special leaves for childcare, and breastfeeding policies. We commend initiatives such as the early career initiative for women and gender responsive leadership training programs. We hope that UNODC could further strengthen measures that support upward mobility in the organization. We appreciate UNODC has expanded its support and outreach activities aimed at preventing and eliminating sexual harassment. Sexual harassment has no place in this organization or in any other. The Philippines looks forward to the outcomes of the midterm review of the implementation of UNODC Strategy for gender equality and women’s empowerment for 2022-2026. It will be useful for member states to be updated regularly on the matter. Thank you very much.

Kazakhstan: Kazakhstan recognizes the vital importance of promotion international cooperation to prevent and combat organized crime, corruption, terrorism, and other forms of criminal activity. This year Kazakhstan was elected for the first time to the CCPCJ for the period for 2025-27. Our country has a lot to share on in the field of police and prison reform including the reduction of the prison population, as well as the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prosecution of citizens return from conflict zones. We especially appreciate the support of UNODC and donor countries for the contrubution to the modernization of our law enforcement system. Last year the Ministry of the Interior of Kazakhstan adopted its development plan for 2023-2027. One of it’s goals in the development and approximation of the penitentiary system of international standards. Kazakhstan is the first Central Asian state to introduce a systematic approach to drug prevention at the level of state policy, which continues to be effective in preventing drug addiction and drug trafficking. This year the activities of 75 laboratories have been suspect…more than 1.3 tonnes of synthetic drugs have been seized and 13 groups involved in drug trafficking, including transnationally have been liquidated. Kazakhstan continues to go through major political and legal reforms, transforming public consciousness, legal culture, and social values, aligned with the goal of building a just Kazakhstan. A new law on crime prevention has been developed which represents a significant step for on the eradication of danger based violence. Kazakhstan’s commitment to human rights, particularly the protection of women, children, and vulnerable groups from domestic violence. This year Kazakhstan adopt a law on combatting human trafficking, which criminalizes offenses such as abduction, unlawful deprivation of liberty, human trafficking, and including forced prostitution. In conclusion, we reiterate our commitment to work closely with member states during Kazakhstan’s membership  in the CCPJ.

China:This statement addresses Agenda Item 4. China appreciates efforts made by CCPJ, CND, and FINGOV. China appreciates efforts by UNODC in the past year and will continue to support and actively participate in various international activities sponsored by UNODC. First, on the fight against narcotics at present the drug situation in the Asia and Pacific region is complex and serious with the production and trafficking of amphetamine and other synthetic drugs becoming a permanent issue. China, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam, and Asia Pacific regional office of UNODC have strengthened cooperation under the framework under the MOU anti-drug cooperation in the greater [x] subregion mechanism, setting up three working groups- preventative education, chemical control, drug testing and analysis, and conducting a number of activities, and strengthened exchange of experiences and antidrug practices. Starting from 2024, China’s annual antidrug contribution to UNODC has increased to 2 million USD, further contributing to the antidrug work globally and in Southeast Asia. At the same tine, China also hopes that UNODC will play a greater role in providing  more technical, human, financial, and policy support  to the Southeast Asian region and cause international community to give more attention to and strengthen its resources and project support to addressing the drug problems in Southeast Asia and to take a comprehensive political and economic measures, as well as develop law enforcement and alternative development programs so as to address drug porblems. Second crime prevention and criminal justice: in recent leadership, under leadership of Executive Director Walle, UNODC has overcome multiple crises, effectively implementing its UNODC strategies 2021-2025 and made positive progress. In recent years, China has made an annual contribution of 800,000 USD to the CCPCJ focussing on project cooperation in the priority areas in the cooperation plans on the two sides. In accordance with the plan of action, strategic cooperation in the field crime prevention and criminal justice signed by the two sides. The two sides have carried out a number of cooperation projects in such priority areas such as legal aid and mutual legal assistance and have achieved positive results. As a next step, China will continue deepen its cooperation with UNODC as well as with other countries and relevant organization around the world. Chair we have noted that efforts made by UNODC to improve the gender balance and geographical representation of the staff, and still notes there is still much room for improvement geographical representation of its staff. China supports UNODC in attracting and employing staff of good character and strong ability and hopes that UNODC will pay attention to the importance of broad geographical distribution. We call upon UNODC to take into account geographical equality, take practical measures  to increase the proportion of staff from underrepresented countries, especially from developing countries and recruit staff from as wide geographical basis as possible at the professional level and above,  so as to enhance the transparency and efficiency by improving the geographical representation of its staff. Thank you.

Japan: On behalf of Japanese government, we extend our gratitude for your unwavering dedication in organizing this joint meeting of the Commissions. Japan recognizes the role of UNODC has become increasingly vital as a principle of a free and international order, grounded in the rule of law in facing unprecedented challenges. As a partner, Japan is committed in supporting UNODC’s activities, increasing our financial contribution to help achieve its goal and priority with regard to the UNODC strategy 2021-2025. We commend effort and results made so far by the leadership Executive Director. My statement is on Agenda 4. Over past decade Japan and UNODC have collaborated closely through annual strategic policy dialogue to address geopolitical, strategic, and socio economic challenges. In July of this year we met in Tokyo to chart out shared priorities for the next three years, building on the solid foundation of earlier joining plan of action. This year Japan contributed 31 million USD to initiate and to strengthening law enforcement capacity, fostering community engagement, and raising public awareness in key areas such as border security, border management, drug control, combatting drugs, combatting human trafficking, and other types of trafficking and counter and prevention of other forms of terrorism. Japan hopes that in formulation and implementation that considerations will be given to gender parity, gender consideration, the environment, and protection of human rights grounded in fairness, transparency, and the rule of law which is at the core of the UNODC mandate and what we share in common with UNODC. To sustain the Organization’s impact we emphasize timely and transparent financial statement to maintain donor confidence and accountability to the tax payer in the country. Furthermore, strengthening public relations efforts is crucial for fostering trust and understanding among the tax payers and the parliament in donor countries. Given the financial challenges facing UNODC, we believe it’s important to make use of program support costs and explore creative funding model. Japan expects the Secretariat to walk the [x] towards developing  transparent funding model. We also add greater equity among Secretariat staff composition particularly in the Senior Leadership and Management posts. We aspire to see recruitment processes that embody [x] as well as gender balance ensuring the environment with principle of  an inclusive truly representative organization. We recognize the effort made by the Secretariat in this regard but at the same time, I believe we see more space for further effort, particularly in the effort for more equitable regional representation in staff particularly in the  management posts.

Belarus: We will be touching on Agenda Item 4. The illegal drug trade, corruption, and and terrorism are a serious threat to international peace and security to development and to achieving human rights. Counteracting these challenges is an indivisible part of efforts to achieve the 2030 agenda. This also determines the important role of UNODC whose mandate covers these problems that I’ve mentioned. In this connection an important role is to be played by the decision making bodies of the CND and the CCPCCJ which determine the mandate of the office.  Thanks to your leadership, both Commissions adopted important decisions at the main sessions, which are action oriented and include the resolution at the CCPCJ initiated by Belarus on countering trafficking persons in the context of rapid technological change. We believe that taking into account global trends the topic [x] that relates to the issues of the mandate of the UNODC will feature in the normative work of both Commissions to [x] to extent. We must note with concern the cases of politicization of discussion in the framework of both Commissions over the past few years. This is seen in that some states challenge the sovereign rights of members of the Commission to initiate draft resolutions basing themselves in arguments of a political nature. The CND and CCPCJ are technical bodies and they should deal with specialized and technical issues. We hope that such a logic will prevail in the work of the Commissions in the year to come. From the context of strategic management we support the standing IG working group in improving the financial situation of UNODC, in particular the focus of the group on issues having to do with the implementation of the UNODC strategy for 2021-25, regional and strategic visions, field programs, and staffing issues. We believe that the group should continue to fulfill the role if it has a forum for dialogue between member states and the Office in strategic or program issues, in order to improve effectiveness of the work of UNODC in these key areas. Turning to the budget, there is no doubt that to effectively achieve its mandate, the UNODC needs sufficient,  predictable, and sustainable funding. In this respect, Belarus, like many other states, would like to express its concerns over the low level of general purpose funding available to the Office. In conclusion, I would like to note that against the backdrop, we have a relatively short time to achieve the 2030 Agenda and the low-level results in the world and on the whole to achieve the SDGs, further strengthening interaction between UNODC and other agencies in the UN system first and foremost in the field is important.

Iran: On Agenda Item 4. The ongoing genocide and war crimes committed by the Israeli regime against innocent civilians in Gaza have continued unabated for the last 14 months with the regime enjoying impunity due to the support of its well known allies. Those actions have violated the most fundamental principles of the UN Charter, international law, and international humanitarian law, undermining the integrity of the entire UN system. Urgent and decisive collective action by the international community needed to end these atrocities and hold the occupying regime and its supporters accountable. Co-chairs we underscore the prominence and active role of the FINGOV and consider its valuable framework to promote understanding between  member states and the Secretariat in matters related to UNODC. We express deep concern over financial challenges faced by UNODC due to the shortfall in general purpose funding and underlying funding trends affecting countries availability to uphold core programmatic functions for supporting developing countries, as well as the provision of timely, adequate technical assistance, transfer of technology and equipment, and capacity building to interested member states based on challenges, needs, and priorities. We are deeply concerned that the lack of adequate funding for country projects and programs has led to failure of UNODC offices to fulfill their mandates in assisting member states in this regard. It highly expected that the office enhance its efforts to ensure that adequate financial and logistical  resources are allocated. We are of the firm belief that international cooperation is a cornerstone of all relevant international conventions and in this respect we emphasize the crucial role of UNODC in strengthening and facilitating such cooperation. We reiterate the importance of addressing challenges and removing the obstacles that hinder countries’ abilities to meet their international obligations in combating illicit drugs and crime. Among the primary obstacles are unilateral coercive measures which contravene international law and the UN charter. These measures have been exacerbated by the politically motivate approach of some donor countries which channel funding to specific projects and programs. This has led to systemic discrimination against several developing countries and such challenges should be reflected in the implementation of UNODC’s projects and programs. Distinguished co-chairs, we would like to remind that Iran’s partnership program with UNODC was signed on margins of 66th CND. However, the level of the support and the projects provided are not aligned with the countries needs and priorities. Iran remains at forefront of the fight against drugs yet the support extended to us, whether promised or delivered falls short and contradicts the principle of fair share. Despite the unfair and politicized measures imposed against us, Iran has steadfastly continued its efforts in the fight against drugs consistently defending the interests of the international community. Afghanistan continues to suffer from the various chronic challenges including lack of economic and industrial infrastructure, as well as political instability that which lasting 50 years old. The recent experience with the inefficiency of the opium ban on Afghanistan clearly demonstrates that the eradication of opium poppy cultivation is deeply intertwines with other socioeconomic factors and requires international cooperation, alongside effective implementation of sustainable alternative development programs. Despite earlier reports of a 95% reduction in cultivation, this decline was not sustained and cultivation in Afghanistan has once again risen. According to the latest report on November 2024 by UNODC, additionally the growing production and trafficking of methamphetamines, along with the and emerging threats of the ATSS and synthetic opiates should not be underestimated. Iran highlights that the UNODC research work should be based on clear and prior mandates and policy guidance provided by the governing bodies. We emphasize the importance of the transparency and regular dialogue and close coordination between all member states and UNODC regarding the ongoing and planned publications and research activities at all stages. In this regard, we stress the importance that the publications of UNODC should be impartial and fully respect the cultural diversity of member states. Regarding human resources, we reiterate our position that further efforts that are aimed at tangible outcomes are still needed to achieve equitable geographical representation in the office. To this end, it is highly expected that the Executive director should concrete measures to narrow the wide gap which has sustained for many years and report thereon to the Commissions. In this regard, FINGOV should play its role and continue its line with the standing agenda item to evaluate progress made by the Office in improving representation from developing countries with special attention to the capable persons from those countries with less or zero percent. The fight against cannot be sustained without collective action. In this regard, Iran, as a frontline country in the antidrug campaign must receive unequivocal support from UNODC, the international community, and beneficiary states. Our success in effectively combating illicit drug trafficking is rooted in coordination, cooperation, and a strong, collective response.

Colombia: In this statement, Colombia would like to refer to 3 topics. 1. We need a UNODC which is more daring to make progress towards more effective solutions. All states need a UNODC which is strong and effective, and mine perhaps more than many others. We have a strong office with a global presence and significant capacity. It is also evident that the Office continues to be ineffective. Production, consumption, and trafficking are at historic levels. Transnational organized crime is ahead of the efforts of states evermore everyday. The Office is doing a great deal but it is not obtaining the results which this membership wishes to see. The problem is that we cannot ask the office to do the impossible. A world free of drugs is not a realistic, pragmatic, or possible aspiration and it is not even an objective set as a binding obligation in the Conventions. What we can ask the Office to do is to ensure that its actions are guided by best practices based on scientific evidence to achieve health and well being. The 2021-2025 strategy is coming to an end so there’s a need to evaluate its implementation and request the Office to propose innovative and effective approaches. This includes the design and implementation with the support of member states of pilot projects which place human beings at the center of drug policies, prioritizing human rights and health. Secondly- facing the scant results of the war on drugs on the global level, how can UNODC do better? The Office is part of the General Secretariat of the UN and should strengthen its strategic coordination with other offices, programs, and agencies of the UN. A better strategic coordination may translate into significant progress at the operational level, bolstering consistency and synergy in international actions to tackle the  situation of drugs and organized crime. We need relevant, up to date publications which address the most urgent problems and which set out the situations in all their complexity which state things as they are and do not give in to being politically correct, leaving it to states to interpret its findings. And finally, how can the office do better, with what results? Colombia recognizes the progress made but we’re concerned with the imbalances between earmarked contributions and general contributions. We continue to call for increase in general contributions in a predictable manner, respecting the capacities of developing countries. Program administrative costs are a significant challenge for Colombia due to high value and lack of standardized rates for all states. It is essential to make progress towards a more equitable model which allows for these expenditures to be optimized, especially in the context where the presence of the Office is already consolidated. I’d like to repeat in Colombia these administrative costs are high and expenditure is duplicated between projects and this has an impact on the Office’s presence there and this allows us to address the conditions under the conventions. We value the initiatives to diversify the donor base but what is crucial is for these to not to compromise the principles of the Organization nor they become the position of the UN on drugs and they should not put additional burdens on developing countries. Colombia reaffirms its commitments to a multilateralism which is effective, inclusive, and results-oriented. We hope that with a critical and collaborative approach, we can strengthen the actions of the UNODC to address the challenges which persist in combatting the world drug situation and the situation to do with transnational organized crime.

United Kingdom: The United Kingdom has long been an advocate of good financial governance, especially accountability and transparency. It’s only through robust financial governance that we can ensure the integrity of and continued confidence in UNODC. For this reason, the United Kingdom has participated in all sessions of FINGOV as an active and interested participant. However, we see some storm clouds. Financial predictability is also important. We, along with many states here today, were taken aback by the worrying budgetary forecast given in the last session and the liquidity crisis. We share the concerns mentioned by many here today and we think actually we are now in a crisis point and an in in depth discussion is very much needed among member states. We should not ignore these important issues. We think these issues deserve our joint focus. And we call upon the Chair of FINGOV to bring us together in 2025 discuss UNODC’s budget status and any support we the states can offer UNODC on these issues. Lastly, like many states have spoken, the United Kingdom would like to mark its support for UNODC’s ongoing efforts to promote inclusivity and gender balance in its work, as well as improving geographic representation in line with the UN Charter. Like the Philippines, we seethat  work remains to be done on empowerment of women and we join them in calling for improvements in upward mobility for women at UNODC. These efforts will build a UNODC that is fit for purpose for the future, as well as ensuring that the UNODC achieves the SDG goals of gender equality and empowerment of women.

Malaysia:  My delegation emphasizes the important role of FINGOV as an inexpensible forum for fostering communication and dialogue between member states and UNODC Secretariat. This mechanism [x] a model of openness, inclusivity, and transparency in the fulfillment of its objectives, bearing in mind the [x] role of UNODC as its mandate and terms of preference. Mu delegation takes notes of the revised [x] and expenditures for the 2024-25 biennium and that expenditures for general purpose funds have been adjusted upward to USD 9.5 million due to recosting, representing zero real growth, compared to the approved budget of USD 9.2 million. We further take note that a program portfolio in South Asia, East Asia, and the Pacific is projected to experienc significant growth by USD 8 million or 50.3%. From USD 52.5 million for 2022-23 period to USD 60.5 million for 2024-25 period. Such expansion underscores the UNODC’s strengthened commitment to those three regions, particularly through enhanced activities in key countries, including my country Malaysia. Malaysia’s inclusion in this strategic focus highlights our pivotal role in addressing regional challenges and advancing collaborative efforts within the Southeast Asia and Pacific framework. However, we are concerned about the ongoing imbalance between earmarked and unearmarked resources, which hampers the [x] ability to respond effectively to emerging and shifting priorities in its mandate. Therefore, we hope this issue can be addressed. In this regard, we encourage member states to actively engage with the UNODC and explore partnerships that can strengthen its programs. We believe that by sharing resources and best practices, we can collectively enhance our responses to emerging global challenges. In concluding, my delegation reaffirms the importance of ensuring continuous and predictable contributions to UNODC in order to enable this body to fulfill its mandate. We call on member states to be united in this regard, with a [x] that the UNODC has the necessary resources to continue to do so.

Morocco: I would also like to deliver a statement on Agenda Item 4. My delegation takes note on the report of UNODC on the consolidated budget for the biennium 2024-25 and wishes to reiterate its full support to the FINGOV management in fulfilling the organization’s mandate. UNODC continues to carry out its programs and activities, despite significant challenges to our global efforts in combating illicit drugs and all forms of organized crimes. My delegation welcomes the implementation of the UNODC stratgy 2021-25, which provides an optimal strategic direction to the Office based on a people-centered approach and centrality of five thematic areas that target the world drug problem: organized crime, corruption and economic crime, terrorism, and crime prevention, and criminal justice. Furthermore, we look forward to the implementation of the strategic vision for Africa 2030 designated to complement and enhance UNODC strategy at the regional level. Cochairs my delegation supports the work of the standing, open ended Intergovernmental Working Group FINGOV and we continue to work actively and constructively  on the issues related to improving the governance and financial situation of UNODC. In this context, we commend the efforts that the UNODC has undertaken so far, by which aim to improve risk management and accountability, as well as promoting responsibility and procedural compliance. However,my delegation would like to share with you the following comments. Morocco believes that the restructuring of the funding model is a top priority in order to ensure more flexible and effective use of funding so that the Office will be more agile and fit for purpose. It goes without saying in this regard that an adequate, predictable, and sustainable funding model for the UNODC remains crucial as to allow the office to continue the provision of technical assistance and capacity building to member states upon their request and priority. My delegation encourages UNODC to re-double its effort in widening the donor base and to explore innovative ways of resource mobilization in order to raise additional funding. In this respect, my delegation invites international donors to continue to pledge adequate general purpose contributions especially flexible and unearmarked contributions. My delegation calls upon the UNODC to strengthen its efforts to ensure the recruitment of  staff on a wide geographical basis in line with article 101 of the charter of the UN and to continue to update member states on measures taken to improve geographical distribution and to ensure gender parity among its staff..In closing, the country of Morocco remains steadfast in its commitment to work with UNODC and member states to address the scourges of drugs and crime at all levels. Thank you.

Afghanistan: Afghanistan stands at a crossroads of complex crisis that directly impact our ability to combat narcotics and organized crime effectively. The elegant [x] straight and in relation to organized crime continue to undermine social stability, economic development, and public health in our country. Behind those challenges by the ongoing political instability, the threatening [x] situation, and severe human rights crisis particularly for women and girls are urgent and require international attention and action. Afghanistan has long been on the frontline in the fight against narcotics. The production and trafficking of illicit drugs remains [x] for organizing crime. Financing network that perpetuated tourism, violence, and exploitation. The Taliban has announced a poppy ban. There has been little focus on the growing methamphetamine production in Afghanistan and there is ongoing [x] over the country’s drug threat. Furthermore, the human rights situation under the Taliban regime situation has reached alarming levels, with women and girls facing the harshest impact of this regressive policies. We urge all member states to [x] on relevant international processes to ensure accountability for those violence to hold those responsible to justice. The international nature of those challenges demands a united response. We call on all member states to uphold their commitments to international conventions, including drug control treaties and UN Convention [x] Transnational Organized Crime and three international drug control treaties. By working together to address the challenge in Afghanistan, we also take a significant step to work fulfilling the 2030 agenda for sustainable development.

Mexico: We warmly express our gratitude for the great support received from all the membership when it came to the adoption by consensus of the [x] drugs resolution in the headquarters in New York. While this action was taken in New York, the negotiation and the debate around this resolution took place at various levels and in various international fora. The result is very interesting because it shows the great interest of all countries and sectors to make progress on achieving greater balance in drugs control and criminalization, which we have traditionally been addressing in terms of drugs and strengthening [x] such as development, human rights, and a public health approach. This is particularly important in order to reverse the social injustice which traditionally  fallen on most vulnerable communities and it is very important in order to align us with the 2030 agenda, which we have all undertaken and which we cannot forget and leave behind…with structural solutions which have demonstrated that they can be a sustained and effective response to addressing this evermore complex phenomenon. On another point with regard to the commitments Mexico took on in the March session of this year to promote an international coalition to principally address the problem of synthetic drugs. It’s a pleasure to inform you that Mexico continues to work towards this regard. Now more than ever, understanding that innovative solutions and alliances or partnerships with the private sector are now indispensable.

Chair: Item 4 will be resumed tomorrow, in the respective Commissions for action-taking. We will now turn to Agenda Item 9 of the CND, entitled, “Contributions by the Commission to the work of the ECOSOC council in line  with General Assembly  Resolution 75/290A 75/290B, including follow up to and review and implementation of the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development. As agreed by the Extended Bureau, this agenda item is open during the joint session and will remain open tomorrow. I now hand over to Ambassador Jose-Antonio. But before I want to find out what the US wants to talk about. It would be at the end of the morning when you have that right. For now, I deny you the right.

CCPJ 1st VICE-Chair: I would now like to open Item 10 on the Agenda of the CCPCJ. We now give the floor to the Secretariat to make a presentation. Miss Jo Dedeyne-Amann you have the floor.

Chief Secretariat to the Governing Bodies, Secretary to the Commissions: Thank you Mr. Chair. We used the reconvened session to provide our member states with an update on work that we are doing as Secretariat in supporting the Chairs and Commissions in contributing also to the Economic and Social Council, which is our mother body. As has been the case in the past the CCPCJ has throughout the year contributed to advancing the 2030 agenda, in particular goal 16. This is an integral part and greater goal of its mandate as a policy making body of the United Nations on crime prevention and criminal justice and the way we do that is through promotional events and also in a way as Secretariat to make sure that where we can link the work of the commissions to the SDGs. This year in particular the commission was also mandated to implement the General Assembly Resolution 78/225 entitled Enhancing the Contributions of the CCPCJ to the accelerate the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. If you recall, this was one of the resolutions negotiated by the CCPCJ last May which was then in December adopted by the Plenary of the G. Now the implementation of that resolution the Secretariat has reached out to Member States and to a wide range of stakeholders, provided them with an opportunity for them to express their views on how the Commission can better contribute to a 2030 agenda. Many ideas were received and they have been compiled in a document conference room paper 5, which was submitted to the high level political forum (HLPF), in addition to the contribution we are making as a standing practice so this year we had two contributions to the HLPF. We have also been..a yearly practice is that the two commissions are holding during the High Level Political Forum a side event and in the side event they showcase the close cooperation they have with other functional commissions of the ECOSOC Council. As you can see from the agenda, we had quite a number of the chairs of other functional commissions contributing in July, including the Commission on the Status of Women, the Commission on Population Developement, the Commission on Science Technology for Development, and the Commission on Social Development. As requested by the Council, we are also as secretariat ensuring that the Commission works hand in hand with its brother and sister Commissions. Now turning to CND, here as was the case in previous years, there have been written contributions to the HPLF and during the Ministerial Segment of the CND in March including during the action pledge intiiated by Ambassador Johnson, there were a lot of references made to the work of the CND in implementing the SDG’s in particular goals 3 and 6, as was the case for CCPCJ contributions for consideration when delegations were negotiating for the Pact for the Future. One of the highlights in the contributions of by the CND to the work of ECOSOC was a side event at the margins of the Coordination Segment in late January, beginning of February where it opportunity to other parts of system to include inputs on how they saw their work as contributing to also to the implementations of the main policy documents within the CND. That was one of the events also that was used in preparation for the negotiations on the Ministerial Declaration adopted in March. This is a calendar what we see is that there are three points in time that the contributions of the CND and CCPCJ will be sought by ECOSOC- in the beginning of February- a contribution to the coordination segment that’s mostly informed  by video message by the respective chair. And then we have the management meetings in June and July where the chair of the respective commission reports back on the main session. Then in again July the high level political forum which will in 2025 focus on undertaking  an in depth review of goals 3,5, 8, 14, and 17, which are in direct relevance to the commissions here. Thank you co-chairs for providing me with the opportunity.

CCPJ 1st VICE-Chair: Thank you, any comments?

Thailand: As a country also standing on the frontline, I will leave the issue on which delegations should be accorded more or less speaking time for other business on the agenda. Cochairs during the regular segment of the CND and this agenda item my delegation extended an invitation to member states and other relevant stakeholder to participate in an international conference in Thailand organized by the Royal Project Foundation and Highland Research and Development Institute in Thailand under the theme from alternative development to sustainable development goals,empowering alternative development to address the global challenges. This invitation was also echoed by CND through its resolution 67/3,  which was adopted by a record number of cosponsors. The International Conference, which was opened by the King of Thailand  on the 1st of December, which was held successfully  right at the edge of the Golden Triangle with participants representing member states and international stakeholders from all regions and concluded on a high note yesterday. During the Conference from the 2nd-4th of December, participants has an opportunity to gain useful information from various keynote addresses, including by UNODC Executive Director and get their first hand experience from key projects. Most importantly, they had the opportunity to exchange their views, experience, and best practices on how alternative development can help enhance the resilience of communities not only against the backdrop of the current and emerging drug and crime related challenges but also within the context of an increasingly complex and interconnected world, including during a time of [x] crisis. We would be able to share a more detailed outcome of the Conference  with the CND later. Nonetheless among several conclusions reached we have found that when alternative development and the efforts to achieve the SDGS are aligned with one another, taking into account locally specific needs and supported by local communities and relevant stakeholders both can be mutually reinforcing. The effects can be multiplied, making those efforts more efficient and cost effective. The conclusion we have reached serves to stress the importance of the work of the two Commissions in our pursuit of the Sustainable Development Agenda. It also reminds us that drug control and crime prevention efforts should not be carried out in isolation but should also take into account other factors, issues, and dimensions, as well as other ongoing collaborations, which can be different, respective to the local context.  Thailand remains firm in our commitment and stands ready to work with all partners for the continued improvement of health, safety, and wellbeing of mankind and to make the SDG’s a reality for all.

Colombia: This agenda item focuses on a topic of particular importance for Colombia that is coordination and consistency within the UN system. We believe that the relation between ECOSOC and the two commissions should go in both directions and beyond formality. Therefore, the established practice of inviting contributions of the sessions of the Commissions from the President of the EcoSoc and other agency leaders, funds, and programs is a practice which should be maintained and strengthened. On another point, the current chairs and presidents have taken important actions in order to keep ECOSOC informed on the work of the CND and CCPCJ and this should continue. But having said this, we believe there are many opportunities to explore. For example in 2025,  the Commission on the Status of Women will celebrate 30 years since the adoption of the Beijing Platform of Action. This will be an opportunity for our two Commissions to contribute on the differentiated way in which drugs and crime impact women. Would this not be an occasion for our discussions to feed into the discussions at the Commission on the Status of Women? The Commission on Population Development will have as its main principle aim over the next year promoting a healthy life at all ages. Do the Commissions have not a great deal to contribute to these discussions? Is this not an opportunity to contribute from our point of view to the debates on demography, public health, drugs, and crime? The Commission on Statistics, the Commission on Social Development, the special procedures, and the human right treaty bodies, and the youth forum are also opportunities to contribute sharing the vision and perspective of Vienna. And finally, I would like to refer to the Pact of the Future. Our starting point is avoiding an overlap in activities and a distortion in the agreements that have already been achieved and effective focus of resources and efforts. But as was recognized in paragraph 19 of the Pact of the Future it is clear that the 2030  agenda is the general roadmap for achieving sustainable development and the work of the Commissions based in Vienna should be focussed on stepping up achievements of this Agenda. Colombia believes that when it comes to the Pact of the Future, the Commissions must be informed at some session of FINGOV about the possible relationship between the Pact and the mandate of the Commissions and they should be provided with information on the planning of the planning for the high level of the General Assembly which planned for the 80th session. And we believe that all of this will serve as input to strengthen our commitment to the United Nations System. Thank you.

CCPJ 1st VICE-Chair: Thank you for the all encompassing statement.

Mexico: Mexico could not agree more with what was expressed by Colombia. We agree on the need for complementary and cross-cutting work between the various Commissions, bodies, and agencies of the UN system . This was also reflected in the omnibus resolution on drugs, which I referred to in my previous intervention. As an example, we could take the case of women. We have data, scientific evidence that women who are mothers, those within this group who have problems with drug consumption, are those who have the most incentive to give up their problematic use of drugs. So we need to have specialized and dedicated programs to reach out to women and pregnant women who have problems with drug consumption. This is obviously complimentary work between UN Women and various different entities when it comes to this issue. This is just showing one place where there could be complementarity.

CCPJ 1st VICE-Chair: This agenda item will remain open and tomorrow there will be opportunity to make additional contributions. There was a reques of the floor by another delegation. I think it was Israel. Right of reply requested by United States There will be a limit of two minutes to right of reply interventions.

United States: With regard to certain comments on this and previous agenda items, I would like to emphasize that we continue to believe that allegations of genocide in Gaza are unfounded. Israel has a right and a duty to defend itself in accordance with international humanitarian law against the horrifying terrorist attacks by Hamas. As the same time, as we’ve made clear, it is critical that Israel do everything possible to prevent civilian casualties, minimize collateral damage, and increase humanitarian access in Gaza.CCPJ 1st VICE-Chair: Israel under same rules, you have floor

Israel:  We firmly reject any baseless accusations regarding violations of international law. Israel is operating fully within the framework of international law in its fight against terrorist organizations funded by the Iranian regime that are operating its paramilitaries across the region risking the entire Middle East. We would like to underscore that there is  no room for unfounded anti-semitic statement. Israel is providing humanitarian aid, delivering over 56,000 truckloads [x]. We are committing doing everything possible to not do harm to non involved individuals. However, it is crucial to know that Hamas intentionally operates within civilian populations and near humanitarian buildings and institutions. By doing so, they are committing double war crimes- indiscriminately targeting Israeli civilians while using residents of Gaza as human shields. Meanwhile Israel continues to  operate in alignment with international law.

CCPJ 1st VICE-Chair: Right of Reply Iran

Iran: Actually we are gathering here in order to have a better situation for humanity for the sake of others. We should be concentrating on the drugs issue but we are attending to have a better situation and human rights. What’s raised here in this meeting is asking attention on dual standards- how is it possible to have dual standards on humanity- you are good kids, you are not good kids.

CCPJ 1st VICE-Chair: Not more requests for rights of reply. With permission of Ambassador Johnson, the joined meeting is now adjourned. CND will resume at 3pm.

---

AFTERNOON SESSSION

Chair:  We will first take up Agenda Item 5 on Implementation of International Drug Control Treaties. I’d like to invite Mr. Konocrane of the Scientific Affairs Officer of the Drug Laboratory and Scientific Services Branch of UNODC to address the Commission.

Drugs, Laboratory, and Scientific Branch: New psychoactive substances (NSP) but they can produce the same harmful effects as controlled drugs. In just over a decade, the number of these substances identified have grown significantly from 254 in 2013 to over 1,260 as of today. Few have been spared with 148 countries and territories worldwide reporting emergence of often harmful substances. Member states, building on international cooperation through this Commission and through national responses have made considerable progress in addressing the threats posed by these substances to human health and welfare. The commission since 2014 has decided, based on scientific evidence to place 83 of the most harmful, prevalent, and persistent NSP under control. UNODC would like to thank the WHO for its expert committee on drug dependence ECDD for its comprehensive work in the evaluation and recommendation of substances for inclusion under international control. We look forward to continue our close working relationship to support the evaluation process with scientific information form UNODC early warning advisory including its toxicology portal. The commission has also made vital decisions on chemical precursors, the building blocks for synthetic drugs. In the last 10 years 28 precursors of methamphetamines, ecstasy, and fentanyl have been added to table 1 of the 1988 Convention. At the national level, your responses to the phenomenon of NPS have all together been proactive and innovative. Together international and national responses have been hugely successful, fully respectful of science, evidence,  and complementarity of the Conventions and national legislative measures. However we continue to face evolving challenges with synthetic drugs. New potent synthetic opioids, many of which are analogues of fentanyl, continue to emerge with 139 of these being actively monitored by UNODC. A number of nitazines, another group of very potent opioids, have also emerged in recent years, of which six has been scheduled in the last 4 years. Benzodiazepines have for decades been a main [x] for their therapeutics, sedative and hypnotic properties. However, they continue to be identified in cases of  drug use while driving in polysubstance use cases. While seven such substances have been placed under international control, they continue to be reported in several countries. Significant challenges also persist in the clandestine manufacture of drugs. The increasing use of designer precursors together with increased scheduling of precursor chemicals presents challenges for the implementation of the Conventions, as well as investigating and dismantling the increased number, scale, and complexity of  clandestine laboratories. This month marks seven decades since the General Assembly established the UN narcotics laboratory to support the then division of narcotic drugs in support member states with the science to inform your decisions. The lessons we have learned in the last decade of intense drug control have taught us the need to follow science and evidence, compliment international measures with innovatice national measures and  build proactive rather than reactive national capacities. We will continue to provide the Commission, INCB, and WHO with accurate scientific information to assist in responding appropriately to emerging threats of NPS and new routes of manufacture of NPS. We’ll do this by strengthening national forensic capacity, generate and share quality scientific evidence, enhancing and evolving our early warning system to provide the scientific,  evidence-based for your decisions and providing tailored technical assistance  to support the implementation of the scheduling decisions of the CND.

Chair: In line with Resolution 5811, I’d like to invite WHO to present the outcome of the 47th meeting of the Expert Committee on Drug Dependence that took place on  14-18 October 2024  to the Commission in order to help member states prepare for forthcoming scheduling decision at the regular 68th session. I wish to mention that the Commission has before it a conference paper entitled Summary of Assessments Findings and Recommendations of the 47th WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence contained in document [x]. I now give the floor to Ms.Delqushi Pevendrin of WHO to report to the Commission about the outcome of this meeting.

WHO: As a reminder to the Commission, the WHO has a mandate within the international drug control conventions, with respect to the 1961 Convention on Psychotropic Drugs, as amended with the 1972 Protocol and the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances. These two conventions give WHO the mandate of reviewing and assessing psychoactive substances to recommend whether they should be controlled internationally. To operationalize its mandate, WHO uses the guidance on the WHO Review of Psychoactive Substance for international control, which has been approved by the World Health Assembly, and also the WHO, and the executive board. WHO fulfills its mandate through its Expert Committee on Drug Dependence or the ECDD and the work of the ECDD considers scientific, medical, and public health findings and must comply with criteria established in the international drug conventions. At the 47th Expert Committee on Drug Dependence, 8 substances were under critical review and the critical review substances are assessed based on the scheduling criteria relating to substance abuse and dependence potential, public health harms and therapeutic use where applicable. As a synthetic cannabinoid, hexahydrocanabinol or HHC reviewed, four synthetic opioids were reviewed- protonitazepyn, metonitazepyne,etonitazepipne, and N-Desethyl-Isotonitazene. Dissociative type substance: 3-hydroxyphencyclidine, a cathinone or stimulant: N-ethylheptedrone, and a medicine: Carisoprodol.  With regards to the four novel synthetic opioids that were reviewed, I will respond to the recommendations together, but just as a reminder here, each of the substances here was reviewed separately, the a separate assessment process and the criteria applied to the each of these individual substances, but for the ease of presenting them, I will group them together today. These are four synthetic opioids that have similar abuse liability and ill effects to other opioids scheduled in schedule 1 of the 1961 single convention. All four of these synthetic opioids were [x] confirmed in hospital admissions and deaths. None of them have any therapeutic uses but they have been detected in falsified opioid tablets. These four opioids have been seized in multiple countries and regions. Upon assessing these four opioids, the expert committee recommended that each of them be added to Schedule 1 of 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. The Committee also reviewed HHC, which is a semi-synthetic cannabinoid with a mechanism of action and effects similar to those of delta 9 THC. This substance has been detected in electronic cartridges, and has been sprayed on hemp material for smoking, and it’s also been sold in edible products. Emergency department admissions reported for the substance nonfatal intoxications, clinical admissions for drug intoxications, in which HHC was confirmed to be the only substance involved. Seizures of this substance were reported in many countries in multiple regions. Therefore, the Expert Committee recommended that HHC be placed under schedule 2 of the  1971 Convention. Next the Committee reviewed the medicine Carisoprodol, a muscle-skeletal relaxant. It’s not listed in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. It is a medicine that has been withdrawn from therapeutic use in some countries due to concerns of increased rates of diversion, nonmedical use, dependence, intoxication, and psychomotor impairment. It has been shown to produce a state of dependence, central nervous system depression, and ill effects similar to those of other substances listed under schedule four of the 1971 Convention. It’s nonmedical uses has been widely documented in multiple countries and regions. Therefore, the Expert Committee has recommended that Carisopodol be added to Schedule 4 of the 1971 Convention. The Committee reviewed the cathinone or stimulant, N-ethylheptedrone, a synthetic cathinone with chemical structure and pharmacological properties similar to those of other synthetic cathinones. It has similar abuse potential to methamphetamine and cocaine. There have been a limited numbers of clinical presentations and a single death recorded in a case where there were multiple substances involved. And there have been seizures in two regions related to this substance. Due to the limited data available, the Expert Committee recommended that the substance be kept under WHO surveillance. Finally, the Committee reviewed 3-hydroxyphencyclidine, which is a dissociative type of substance with a mechanism of action similar to PCP. There were a limited number of fatal and nonfatal intoxication cases reported for the substance in which  3-hydroxyphencyclidine was not analytically confirmed.  In addition limited seizures have been reported in several countires. And therefore the Expert Committee recommended that this substance be placed under WHO surveillance. The critical reviews and formed recommendations of the Committee and the meeting report of the Expert Committee will be published in our Technical Report Series early next year in 2025 before the Commission convenes in March and all critical review reports can be found online in the ECDD repository and I thank you.

Chair: I now open the floor. Is there any delegation interested?

Bolivia: The delegation of Bolivia, is a representation of the dignity of Indigenous People in their historic struggle. We thank UNODC and WHO for information presented. In this space, we would like to recall the firmness with which states shoulder their responsibility to guarantee that the decisions in this Commission are based on scientific truth and on the respect of the rights of Indigenous people. As you’ll be aware, the inclusion of Coca leaf on Schedule 1 of the 1961 Convention was not just a historic error but a direct aggression towards our identity and culture. As this distinguished audience are also aware, in 2011 Bolivia declared its sovereignty and sovereign right to protect the medical, nutritional, and cultural use of the coca leaf. It is a resource which feeds the soul and body of our people. And we rejoined in 2013 with a reservation which specifies these uses. Bolivia has also demonstrated with integrity and responsibility that it is possible to implement effective mechanisms of control which balance the preservation of ancestral practices against the fight against drug trafficking, which Bolivia is committed to. For Bolivia, it’s also important to note that one thing is unacceptable: while other plants have been recognized for their medicinal properties, such as marijuana for example. The medical potential of the coca leaf continue to be ignored, perpetuating errors and prejudices, which continue to this day. So the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and Convention 169 of the ILO are clear: Indigenous Peoples continue to have rights to their Indigenous medicines and to conserve their medicinal plants and is this is why  Bolivia, as is well known requested under article 3 of this Convention, a critical review of the Coca leaf. This process is not just a technical issue; it’s an act of historic justice. The report which was issued in 1950 led to an unfair scheduling and undermined those who have been ancestral protectors and guardians of it. This is going to be an opportunity to destigmatize the distortions and prejudices, which have been attached to the coca leaf. This ancestral plant should be revindicated as it is the heritage of Indigenous Peoples with an immense potential for humanity as a whole and it is an expression of life in harmony with nature.

Pakistan: The CND plays a central role as the principal policy making body on international drug control. The 3 drug control conventions are the linchpin of the international drug control system. I would like to reaffirm Pakistan’s commitment to effectively addressing and countering the world drug problem in full conformity with the 3 drug control conventions. The launching of anti-narcotics policy of Pakistan in 2019 bears witness to Pakistan’s resolve in implementing recommendations in the 2019 Ministerial Declaration in addressing the world drug problem. This national policy lays down the essential guidelines for ensuring stronger supply and demand reduction, international coordination and cooperation at national provisional levels to address the drug challenges. I would also like to share that Pakistan is maintaining strong border patrols, and focusing on enhancing law enforcement and criminal justice response to identify, disrupt, and dismantle drug trafficking groups. Promoting counternarcotics cooperation with the international antidrug agencies for real time intelligence sharing is another area of focus for Pakistan. Mr. Chair we continue to share our deep concern of the legalization of cannabis for non-medical and nonscientific purposes in some parts of the world. Besides its adverse impacts on public health and safety, we second the INCB’s assessment that such [x] contradict the 1961 Single Convention and present a significant challenge in the implementation of this convention. Mr. Chair we ask the member states to adhere to the provisions of the three drug control conventions and ensure the full and effective implementation. We also appreciate the INCB for its [x] work and its continued efforts for monitoring and compliance with the drug control conventions, in close consultations with the states. We reiterate our commitment to collaborative efforts in safeguarding the international drug control system and address emerging challenges.

China: We thank UNODC and WHO for the information provided. China has been firmly supporting and actively implementing the 3 international drug control conventions, which from our perspective constitute the cornerstone of global drug control efforts. We are currently  facing serious global drug situation with the continued spreading of traditional drugs such as heroin and cocaine. The rise in number of increasing categories of synthetic drugs, including NPS and the expansion of drug markets. Countries are facing huge challenges. China has been closely following the manufacturing, trafficking, and abuse of synthetic drugs at home and abroad. We have strengthened our efforts in these areas through a portfolio of measures, including monitoring, scheduling, law enforcement and through international cooperation. Currently 509 narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, including 188 NPS are scheduled in China. Fentanyl and synthetic cannabinoids have been group scheduled. 45 precursors, including Ephedrines as one broad category, have been scheduled in China. Under targeted precursor chemicals export control policy, exports to specific countries such as Myanmar, Laos, and Afghanistan are subject to stringent review and approval. The Chinese government appreciates efforts by the CND, UNODC, INCB, and WHO strengthening, monitoring, evaluating, and scheduling substances. We hope that all parties base their work on scientific substance, uphold objectivity, fairness, and justice in their work and carry out cautious assessment evaluation before any decisions to schedule or deschedule a substance.

Japan: Last November’s thematic discussions underscored the profound challenges we face in   combating illicit drugs. We heard repeated calls for coordinated and for active response, one that makes full use of global expertise. We are deeply grateful for organizations like UNODC, WHO, INCB whose essential work is guiding us through this global crisis. Japan is deeply concerned with the rapid spread of synthetic drugs, especially methamphetamines. Between 2017-2022, the seizures of global methamphetamines doubled, underscoring the urgency to address this escalating problem. In Southeast Asia, production has spread beyond the Golden Triangle to hidden sides in neighboring countries complicating [x] and enforcement. Criminal networks [x] drugs now operate like legitimate businesses using AI, artificial intelligence  and the parallel banking system to fuel their activities. The scale and sophistication of these operations will inevitably have a global impact, driving increased illicit drug availability, public health crisis, and financial crime. In an increasingly interconnected world, the current situation demands a coordinated and multilateral response. Frameworks like the UNODC’s information sharing platform are the United States led global coalitions are an valuable tools for pooling resources and sharing intelligence. Japan is fully committed to these partnerships and will continue to support INCB and the UNODC programs, recognizing that meaningful progress in addressing this crisis hinges on global cooperation. Moreover, Japan acknowledges that our traditional, reactive response have often been costly, slow, and ineffective. To make meaningfully progress it is important to move towards proactive strategy thats stays one step ahead of criminals. We must consider nomadic and nontraditional approaches, ones that are sophisticated, if not moreso than those of criminal networks. To adapt to these ever-changing crisis, scheduling is key.  Accelerated scheduling processes are vital and Japan firmly supports INCB’s approach, especially their approach to regulate chemically similar precursor substances, as discussed at last CND session. It is a smart approach that effectively disrupts the production cycle of the synthetic drugs and provides a practical solution to these emerging threats. While we understand the concerns about how this aligns with the specific criteria in the 1988 Convention Criteria, the magnitude of the threat we face, calls for flexibility while still respecting our Treaty obligations. Japan [x] the strong cooperation between the UNODC and INCB to ensure our measures are most effective and legally sound. Mr. Chair, as we near the close of this year, let us reflect on the lessons learned from the past experiences. Let us embrace flexibibility, innovation, and collaboration as we strive to safeguard public health and safety from the rapid increase of synthetic drugs.

Indonesia: Indonesia remains committed to enforcing the three drug control conventions as the cornerstone of the global drug control system. We believe these conventions provide sufficient flexibility while ensuring necessary control to address the world drug problem. Allow me to highlight several actions Indonesia through its national narcotic board has undertaken in implementing these treaties. First we have strengthened our legislative framework by consistently implementing law number 35/2009 on narcotics, complemented by new regulation, particularly addressing new psychoactive substances (NPS), which continue to develop dynamically. As of November 2024,  172 NPS are circulating in Indonesia with 167 already regulated by the Minister of Health. Regarding the [x] during the 67th session CND the following can be reported. Butonitazepyn and 3-chloro-metacatedone 3-CMC have not yet been included in the regulation of the Indonesia Minister of Health. Dipentilone has been categorized as a schedule 1 narcotic under regulation under Minister of Health. 2-florodisketamine has been listed as a schedule 1 psychotropic substance. Bromozelum is currently in the finalization process to be listed as a schedule 1 psychotropic substance. We have enhanced our supply reduction, through intensified border control operations and strengthened maritime interdiction. We have significantly expanded our demand reduction programs by implementing evidence-based prevention programs, developing community-based interventions, and strengthening after-care services . And we have deepened our international cooperation in active participation in Asian mechanism, bilateral cooperation with strategic partners, capacity building programs and information sharing with international and strategic partners. Mr. Chairs, Indonesia faces several challenges such as proliferation of NPS, the increasing use of dark web and cryptocurrency in drug trafficking, the abuse of pharmaceutical products, and the adaptations of the drug syndicate to post-pandemic conditions. To address these challenges, we are strengthening our forensic laboratory capabilities, enhancing our cybercrime investigation capacities, implementing an early warning system, and modernizing our detection and interdiction capabilities. Mr. Chair Indonesia implements a balanced approach to control substance management through comprehensive regulatory framework with electronic licensing and tracking system, enhanced medical access through facility expansion, and simplified procedures, robust prevention through multilayered verification,  and real time monitoring and surveillance systems. Mr. Chair, in closing, we call upon Member States to strengthen international cooperation mechanism, share best practices and lessons learned, support capacity building initiatives, and enhance technical assistance programs.

Iran: We underscore that the single convention on narcotic drugs of 1961, as amended by 1972 protocol, the convention of psychotropic substances of 1971, and the UN Conventions against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988 constitute the cornerstone of the international drug control system and reiterate that the CND is the policy making body of the UN with prime responsibility for drug controlled matters and INCB as the monitoring treaty mandated body in the field of drug control. The Islamic Republic of Iran has adopted and implemented a balanced approach to countering the drug problem. This approach encompasses a wide range of initiatives, including demand reduction, prevention, treatment, harm reduction, rehabilitation, social support, and vocational training for addicts, as well as combating illicit drug trafficking. For instance, during the first nine months of 2024, Iran seized over 330 tonnes of various drugs along its shared border with Afghanistan, resulting in the loss of eight members of its law enforcement and intelligence forces. Let me ask your attention to a fact and tragic story of mine. We have to tackle the terrorists and drug dealers in border and desert areas that they are carrying heavy weapons. It means that drug dealers in the region are totally different from the streets of Europe and we have to pay attention to this. In this situation, we couldn’t access or buying or obtaining a facility for border management based off the sanctions, illegal sanctions imposed to my country and what they say that dual instruments. Additionally, it’s important to note that nearly 1 billion dollars is allocated for the implementation of national comprehensive strategy addressing various aspects of the drug problem within the country. As far as our region is concerned, the decline in drugs production and subsequent rise in drug price has led to a rise in the demand for the production and trafficking of new psychoactive substances (NPS). Approximately ten NPS have been detected in Iran, namely chemical and Datura with herbal origin, ketamine with medicinal origin, and bufotenin, with animal origin. The growing diversity of NPS, coupled with the lack of knowledge among law enforcement and monitoring bodies underscores the need for information sharing and experiences, as well as for coordinated measures by national agencies across countries. Once unknown substances enter local markets in any country, it’s crucial to have an effective legislative framework in place to enforce national control measures, conduct relevant examinations, and share findings with the authorities of other countries. Additionally, we encourage the development and use of early warning systems at both national and international levels, particularly the UNODC early warning advisory to identify and share information on NPS. Regarding the challenges in the listing and scheduling of substances, Iran enjoys a concrete structure known as the National Anti-Narcotic Act, approved in 1988, as well as an interorganizational entity known as drug control headquarters (DCHQ), which comprised 24 Ministers and national institutions, presided by the President. Being a party to the three international conventions, Iran has brought under national control all drugs included in tablets under the International Control Regime, in accordance with article 40 of the Anti-narcotic acts. I should emphasize that our law enforcement and intelligence agency are dedicated to monitoring and gathering information under diversion of chemical precursors and abuse of new substances by illicit networks. The findings are forwarded to the special committee with the Iranian DCHQ for further review, which may result in the national classification or scheduling of these substances. For instance, Iran’s police and custom administration have observed an increase in number of large shipments of acetyl chloride into Afghan territory. These were due to their use as an illegal chemical precursor to produce heroin. Iran has scheduled the substance and already reported the relevant case to UNODC and INCB through the PIC’s mechanism. We are also deeply concerned about the legalization of cannabis for so-called recreational purpose. We fully support the assessment of the INCB, which highlights that the growing trend to permit the use of cannabis use for non-medical and nonscientific purposes violates the 1961 single convention and poses significant challenges to the international community, the state parties to the drug control conventions, and the effective implementation for these conventions.

Colombia: I’d like to highlight the importance of the information meeting on the process of critical review of the classification or scheduling of the coca leaf, as well as the updates which were discussed during this commission. These fora are essential to make progress towards a fairer analysis based on scientific evidence. With regards to coca leaf, my delegations would like to make 3 elements clear for the consideration of this room. 1. There is no scientific evidence at all to include coca lead in schedules 1 and 4 of the single convention of 1961.  2. This inclusion in schedules 1 and 4 is an attack on the practices and rights of Indigenous Communities of the Andes. 3. This inclusion also undermines the implementation of a global drug policy which is pragmatic, effective, and focused on health and wellbeing and I will explain this.  The inclusion of coca leaf on schedules 1 and 4 of the single convention of 1961 was the result of historic decisions influenced by [x]  reports which ignored the traditional, industrial, cultural and medicinal uses of the plant. This scheduling not only lacked scientific rigor but it also stigmatized fundamental ancestral practices for Andean communities. I’d like to repeat there’s no scientific evidence at all justifying the inclusion of the coca leaf in these schedules. Our communities continue to use it without any danger to their health- physical and mental health. It’s evident that no country wishes to see the problematic use of cocaine in its society. My delegation would like to suggest that if we want to be effective in reducing the production of cocaine, we must seek alternatives which allow farmers from the Andes to obtain the same benefits through legal, industrial uses. The only sustainable way of reducing production of cocaine is through producing uses which are equally profitable for coca leaves. Alternative development projects, although valuable, unfortunately do not have the scope nor do they provide comparable profitability. Therefore, exploring the industrial and commercial potential of the coca leaf should be the priority. Colombia believes that the process of critical review led by the ECDD of the WHO represents a historic opportunity to correct this injustice. This analysis needs to be backed up by rigorous scientific evidence, including studies on the nutritional, therapeutic, and social benefits of the coca leaf. It should also recognize its traditional uses and its cultural importance.  Our delegation selected the topic of scientific evidence as the core of interactive dialogues because we’re certain that this principle should guide our work in this Commission. When the CND receives the review from the Expert Committee, we hope that scientific evidence prevails in the recommendation and then we hope that in this body, pragmatism prevails. Given the failure of global drug policy and facing the same situation, Colombia like to reiterate its intention to work together with Indigenous People and to promote sustainable solutions which respect human rights, cultural sovereignty, and economic development of producer countries.

Malaysia: My delegation appreciates the INCB consultations with member states on the human rights dimensions of the drug control conventions on 8 November 2024 and affirms our unwavering commitment to the prevention of drug abuse and to uphold human rights in alignment with the three international drug control conventions and the fundamental principles of human rights.  As a state party to the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances and 1988 Convention. Malaysia has consistently endeavored to integrate these frameworks into its national policies. We remain steadfast in our efforts to ensure the health and wellbeing of our people while protecting society from adverse effects of drug misuse. Malaysia remains committed to addressing the world drug problem through a comprehensive, integrated, and balanced approach between enforcement and human rights. This approach is reflected in our increased focus on prevention, rehabilitation, and harm reduction strategies. We further remain committed to ensuring that our efforts to combat drug abuse are consistent with international standards regarding the right to health, nondiscrimination, prohibition of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment through close collaboration with international partners, civil society, and relevant stakeholders. Mr. Chair, my delegation takes note with appreciation of the 2023 INCB report released in March of this year and appreciates the reference on the progress Malaysia has made in strengthening drug control legislation. However, we would like to register our reservation of the use of the term LGBTI in the report, a term which is not universally accepted. In this regard, and while noting the independence and professionalism of the INCB, we stress for the importance of the Board to be impartial and respectful of the cultural diversity and particularities of member states. In concluding, my delegation remains committed to international cooperation in combatting drug trafficking and drug abuse while upholding the fundamental principles of human rights in achieving a more equitable and effective drug policy. I thank you Mr. Chair.

Côte D’Ivoire: We would like to endorse all of the statements that have been made in this session. Côte D’Ivoire and the delegation representing Côte D’Ivoire would like to avail itself this opportunity to speak to our efforts to combat the world drug problem with the noble goal of ending drug abuse, this complex scourge, which at times, seems to be too much for us to handle and threatens future generations. My country would like to endorse the statements of all countries that wish to condemn the scourge of all drugs. This is a phenomenon that is weakening our society’s institutions and this is why we’ve put together a legal framework to combat the scourge. At the national level, since 1999, we’ve placed a very strict set of legislations to punish drug consumers with prison terms. We also have an inter ministerial committee to combat drugs- CLAD. We also have the customs, police force, and the specialized [x], who monitor drug consumers and traffickers. We also work on seizing and confiscating criminal assets related to drug trafficking. In terms of international cooperation, we host the CREFELD-regional counter narcotics training center. It provides trainings based on the policies defined UNODC. I’d like to thank UNODC for its decisive contribution to our common struggle. We’ve also ratified various international treaties and conventions against drugs. We are participants in [x], the  intergovernmental action against money laundering in West Africa. We also participate in [x], the national financial intelligence processing unit. And we have procedures in place to track movements of cash related to drug trafficking. Despite our efforts we continue to be confronted with structural weaknesses in terms of treatment for drug users. Treatment is one of the best ways to reduce proliferation. Also due to instability in the West African region and Sub Saharan region this is providing fertile ground for drug trafficking and all types of crimes. It’s for this reason that Côte D’Ivoire would like to call for vigilance and for the support of the international community. We need to build capacity in combating drugs, including synthetic drugs. We would like to see increased mutual legal assistance because the world drug problem concerns all countries and knows no borders. Drugs and terrorism feed into each other so we need to unite with each other in order to rid the world of the scourge of drugs.

Brazil: I would like to highlight two key issues or two central ideas or values of Brazil’s perspective on the implementation of the International Drug Control Treaties: First, it is widely acknowledged that prevention remains an effective cornerstone of drug policy. But on top of that Brazil is increasingly aware of tailoring its prevention strategies to address the specific needs of vulnerable and minority groups. These groups often face systemic barriers to healthcare, education, and social support are disproportionately affected by the socioeconomic vulnerabilities that increase their susceptibility to drug dependence and involvement in illicit economies. Studies show that successful drug prevention is intrinsically linked to promoting equitable access to public services for marginalized populations, including Black communities, Indigenous Peoples, Women, and ensuring no one is left behind in our collective efforts to combat drug-related challenges. And the second issue is that Brazil is increasingly attentive to the intersection between drug trafficking and environmental degradation. Clandestine activities associated with drug production often cause severe environmental harm. For instance in ecologically sensitive regions, such as the Amazon, illegal airstrips and roads created by traffickers fragment ecosystems, accelerate deforestation, and facilitate unlawful practices, including illegal mining and logging. Additionally, organized crime undermines environmental protection efforts, posing a dual challenge to law enforcement and conservation. So addressing this issue is a shared responsibility, demanding urgent and coordinated action from Brazil and also the global community. Brazil remains steadfast in its commitment to a balanced and integrated approach to drug policy, one that prioritizes prevention, equity, and the preservation of our national heritage.

Algeria: As we are aware, the World Drug Problem is complicated and multifaceted, which needs a holistic and balanced approach to address it. The Single Convention of 1961, as amended by the Protocol of 1972, the Convention of 1971 and the Convention of 1988, the political declaration 2016 UNGASS outcome, and the Ministerial Declaration 2019 constitute the cornerstone of our comprehensive work to counter the world drug problem. I take the opportunity to reiterate Algeria’s full commitment to these international drug control instruments and as well as its full support of UNODC and INCB efforts to tackle the world drug problem. To efficiently face this historic problem Algeria has taken concrete measures. Last year, my country has enacted a new law amending its domestic legislation against illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances substances. By introducing a national classification of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances which will be in addition to international schedules based on drugs, illegal trafficking, and crimination in order to counter the proliferation of drug trafficking of new forms like medications diverted from their medical use for addiction purposes among teengers and youth people, especially [x] and tramadol. Without prejudice to this, the right of availability and access to this controlled substances so that it could relieve pain of suffering people and in full accordance with international conventions, which gives states parties the possibility to take measures to protect public health, national security, and welfare. On the other side, the Algerian health authorities are working on the treatment and rehabilitation level by encouraging addicted people to start detoxification treatment and exempting them from any criminal prosecutions under the condition of pursuing cooperatively detoxification treatment. We have until now 48 medium treatment centers  and five big ones. In addition to these existing centers, we join CND’s pledge for action. In this regard, Algeria has pledged to build four new modern, highly equipped treatment centers. We have finished the first step of these centers’ establishment by choosing four cities to host them with a view to add a fifth one. Mr. Chair, Algeria expresses its deep concern about the legalization of recreational use of cannabis, even if until now very few countries allow this nonmedical nonscientific use. But the numbers of these countries might increase in the coming years. Cannabis has proved addiction dangers so we think that allowing recreational use would be a dangerous step, which would undoubtedly affect public health, welfare, and even nations’ public security. Everyone has the right to enjoy the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. To conclude, Algeria calls on UN member states and stakeholders to work closely together in order to work together and address and counter the world drug problem.

United States :The United States is a proud supporter of UNODC’s Global Smart Program whose work is essential is sharing the latest trends in forensics in the synthetic drug threats challenging our global community. As traffickers continue to develop novel psychoactive substances, initiatives such as Global SMART ensure counter narcotic efforts around the world keep pace to address the current drug market trends and developments. We also proudly support UNODC’s early warning advisory, whose work keeps us informed on new and emerging substances, as well as developing trafficking trends and patterns. Regarding subitem b we appreciate the update on the ECDD’s work and the US supports the WHO’s scientific drug evaluation system that guides the international scheduling process. A scientific review of the coca leaf following standard procedures in place for the review of other substances will allow the Commission to make an informed decision regarding the appropriate status of the coca leaf within the international drug control system and we look forward to receiving the ECDD’s report. Regarding subitem c, the US appreciates the INCB for fulfilling the responsibilities entrusted into it bt the treaties, in particular Article 9 of the Single Convention, with respect to narcotic plants. We applaud the INCB’s support of the Commission in taking action this past March on substances not used in the illicit manufacture of drugs but which share chemical properties with those substances currently used. The scheduling of 18 precursors for synthetic drugs is a clear reminder of the value and impact of the Commission and its work. Finally regarding subitem d, the US supports the CND working collaboratively to identify proactive practices to address gaps in the availability of narcotic drugs or other controlled substances for medical and scientific purposes, while preventing diversion and misuse and trafficking. No one should suffer from untreated pain or be denied medicines they need and in this regard we welcome the WHO’s efforts to prepare guidelines on balanced national control medicine policies to ensure medical access and safety, which we hope will be a useful tool for all.

Morocco: We would like to reiterate our commitment to implement the international conventions on drug control, the policies that we’ve adopted together to rise to the many challenges posed by the world drug problem. In the framework of implementing our international commitemnets related to the world drug problem, the Kingdom of Morocco has put in place a globally integrated strategy to combat illegal trafficking and that of psychotropic substances. It ties in very well with with the relevant international instruments on drug control. Our strategy is based in supply reduction, prevention of consumption, abuse of drugs and psychotropic substances and combating drug trafficking networks takes the form of [x] action that we carry out on a number of different fronts. Thus our efforts have led to the reduction of the total area under cannabis cultivation by 80% between 2003-2023. Along the same lines on following the decision of this Commission to allow the scientific and medical use of cannabis under recommendation of WHO. In 2021, we adopted law 1321 on the licit use of cannabis. This is aligned with our efforts to reduce supply of illicit cannabis.  This law provides for a framework for the use of industrial, cosmetic, medical cannabis and will lead to the transfer of illicit cannabis cultivation towards licit cannabis cultivation, and will lead to increased revenues for farmers in areas where this is permitted. Chair-person, alongside the efforts that we’ve mentioned, and in line with out efforts to reduce illicit supply, in 2021, we made combating drugs as a priority of our government. We aim here to dismantle criminal networks involved in drug trafficking. There have been major seizures of drugs of all kinds. We firmly believe that the world drug problem can only be addressed in a multilateral framework. We need to have transparency and responsibility among all parties in order to meet with tangible results that will allow us to face off the evolving challenges of the world drug problem, with special mention of the problem of synthetic drugs. The world drug problem is a common shared responsibility that must be addressed through international cooperation based on regional, subregional, and international shared responsibility. This must be the pivot for all common action that aims to secure positive results. Thank you.

Chair: I give the floor to the state of Palestine.

Palestine: Mr. Chair, this session is being held while our people in Gaza are being subjected to a genocide at the hands of the forces of the colonial occupation Israel. A report issued two days ago by Amnesty International confirmed that Israel is practicing genocide in Gaza. We have to add that our people also in the West Bank are being subject to daily terrorism by Zionist settlers. This is why it’s’ unacceptable that such a rogue state which is  Israel remains as a member of [x]. Mr. Chain- the state of Palestine affirms its full commitment to all  international agreements created to combating illicit drugs. We do welcome the role played by UNODC in continuing to combat the scourge. The state of Palestine welcomes full cooperation with the international community in order to confront the drug problem globally, regionally, and locally. We do believe that the problem of drugs presents a multifaceted challenge for all societies, individuals, and governments. This is why we need concerted efforts in order to reduce its effect on all aspects of life. We would like to emphasize the importance of relevant measures to reduce supply and demand for illicit drugs. This has to be taken by the international community in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the UN, as well as international law and universal declaration of human rights, while respecting the sovereignty of states and the non-interference principles. Mr. Chair- the State of Palestine witnesses exceptional circumstances. It is under Israeli occupation, which controls all land, sea, and airports. Despite all of this, our police forces have achieved major steps in the field of combating drug crimes, in terms of security control, prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation. We have established a laboratory. We have also a police dog unit. We have various technologies assisting us in early detection. We also have a center for treating and rehabilitating addicts and we have a center for treating opioid substitutes. These achievements have been made possible with the international community’s help. The equipment and technology we have been able to get thanks to the UN. We thank all states that have helped us. In terms of our relationship with UNODC, we have been keen on communicating, supporting, building capacities, and providing consultation with UNODC through the office in East Jerusalem, the regional office in Cairo, as well as the main office in Vienna. We would like to hope that UNODC office will renew its programs in supporting law enforcement in the state of Palestine. We would like to also emphasize our commitment to prevent crime and promote criminal justice. This is why Palestine has adopted a national program to combat drugs and promote criminal justice in Palestine, within the program to prevent crime and strengthen criminal justice in Arab countries. Thank you very much.

Chair: I thank the state of Palestine.

South Africa: My delegation reiterates South Africa’s commitment to the three International Drug Control Conventions. We are extremely grateful for the support provided to the CND to carry out its work and joins to a scientific and evidence based approach to combating the world drug problem.  South Africa is committed to this through the National Drug Master Plan, which is aimed at countering and addressing stigma and substance abuse disorder. While our country has made progress, we are aware of persistent, new, and emerging challenges that require enhanced, collaborative, international cooperation.  Chair, in this regard, my delegation underscores the importance of addressing the critical challenges that hinder access, availability, and affordability of controlled substances for medical and scientific purposes, particularly for pain relief and palliative care in developing countries. The deprivation of essential medicines in the developing world contradicts established human rights standards and norms and this warrants further attention at the international level. As Africa takes steps to address the challenges affecting affordability, we align with efforts to initiate and expand local manufacturing enterprises for essential commodities on the continent and we encourage the international community to do the same. We express appreciation to all of our partners for providing technical assistance and enhancing cooperation within our region.

Chair: The agenda item will remain open. We now move to Agenda Item 6- entitled Follow Up to the Implementation at  National Regional And International Levels of All Commitments as Reflected in the Ministerial Declaration of 2019 to Address and Counter the World Drug Problem. In the Ministerial Declaration of 2019, member states decided to conduct in 2024 a Midterm review in the Commission in the lead up to the 2029 review of the progress made in implementing all international drug policy commitments. At the opening of the high level segments, member states adopted by consensus the high level declaration by the CND on the 2024 midterm review following up to the ministerial declaration of 2019. During the high level segment, I allowed you to pledge for action initiative. I would like to thank all those who made a pledge. Following the adoption of the declaration, the Commission in May 2024 adopted by Silence for [x] work plan for the thematic discussions to be held in the leadup to the review in 2029. The first one was held from 12-14 November 2024 and I was also pleased to see that a number of delegations used the opportunity to inform the Commission about the progress in the implementation of their respective pledges made at the time of the high level segment in March.   I will now give the floor to the Secretary to make introductory remarks.

Chief Secretariat of Governing Bodies: This is more of a refresher of what the Commission has been undertaking in the course of the year. The highlight was of course in March, the mid-term review, which was conducted on the basis on modalities resolution, a plenary with a general debate, two multi stakeholder roundtables. The midterm review was taking stock of the implementation of the policy documents that had been reiterated in the declaration of 2019. with a final review to take place within the commission in 2029. At the opening, the Commission was able to adopt by consensus a high level declaration to guide the way forward and was after a period of many meetings chaired by yourself, Mr. Chair but even the President of the General Assembly was very pleased that consensus could be reached on this document when he was with us at the opening of the high level segment. The session was seeing a record level of participation, not just from member states but also from a wide range from other stakeholders. And also during the regular session we had 4 resolutions being adopted, as well as a record number of decisions on scheduling matters.  As you already referred to, what was making this high level segment quite special is that we saw for the first time within the CND, at your initiative, a pledging initiative. We had 66 member states pledging but from the very beginning, you mentioned Mr. Chair that wanted to see accountability. So we were very pleased to see that during the CND thematic discussions we had 17 member states in November reporting back on what had happened to their pledge in the meantime. The box is back in the room because we have been informed that there are two more member states that would like to make a pledge today. So they will also come to elect a leader…And there is one member state who would like to report on the implementation of the pledge. This is really an ongoing joint endeavor in the period ahead in the lead up to 2029. We were referring to the fact that we had thematic discussions in November on three of the challenges identified in the 2019 Ministerial Declaration  based on a work plan adopted in May 2024 and that took into account also the content agreed upon in the Ministerial Declaration of this March. I’m not going to read out the three challenges under consideration, you can see them on the screen. What was new was that in a way the commission had in the work plan and organizational arrangements agreed on a new format, so a moderated panel discussion, with questions that the panelists responded to and which also created an interactive discussion with the floor. Throughout, special attention was given in the discussion guide that was guiding these thematic sessions to the cross cutting issues that had been identified in the March Ministerial Declaration- namely the need for more cooperation, data collection and analysis, use of new technologies, and for enhanced technical assistance and resource mobilization. These act in a way throughout these five sessions that we had on the topics, it was in a way accompanied with a sixth session on other substantive matters where delegations  had an opportunity to submit issues that they wanted to see considered. We had six issues introduced by respective member states which were then the basis of debate within the room. As already mentioned, the thematic discussions also provided opportunity for delegations to report back on their pledge. With this I can close with the last slide that here again includes the link to the website and our social media. The website that includes information on the thematic discussions on the pledge initiative so please kindly take a look there. Thank you.

Chair: We have two members who will be making their pledges.

Croatia: With a view to strengthen the implementation of international drug policy commitments and exemplifying our balanced approach, Croatia reaffirms its commitments to a comprehensive  evidence-based and integrated strategy to address illicit drug challenges with a vision to achieve tangible progress by 2030. Our national strategy prioritizes a multidisciplinary approach addressing emerging issues, such as NSP, high risk drug use behaviors, and the critical importance of further developing early detection of new trends and appropriate responses. We are dedicated to addressing both the supply and demand of illicit drugs by reinforcing prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation programs by implementing effective policies to reduce availability and tackle drug-related crime at all levels. Highly dynamic and increasingly complex drug markets present a serious challenge, requiring to strengthening of partnerships and close collaboration among all relevant stakeholders to jointly address public health and security concerns. At the same time, new developments require flexibility in innovations in detecting, monitoring, and responding to emerging trends. While modern technologies, such as encrypted platforms which can be misused, we should strive to look into their potential especially for advancing  early interventions and harm reduction measures. Croatia remains steadfast in its commitment to fostering international cooperation to address evolving drug challenges. Through coordinated efforts we aim to safeguard public health, promote social well being, and uphold human rights in the ongoing fight against drug misuse.

Moldova: Mr. Chair- the Republic of Moldova has made significant strides in addressing drug related issues guided by commitment to strengthening its national legal framework and aligning its policies with international legal standards. Some key developments include: adoption of 2022-25 national crime prevention and control program which replaced the previous national anti drugs strategy, with a focus on drug prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation. Ongoing efforts to revise the national legislation, including the modification of laws governing the circulation of narcotic substances to align with EU standards. In 2023, law enforcement agencies initiated 963 criminal cases related to drug offenses, reflecting the ongoing challenges possessed by drug trafficking and consumption. Synthetic drugs, predominantly originating from neighboring regions have emerged as a growing concern due to their low cost and accessibility. During the same period Moldova recorded over 60 cases of drug smuggling underlining its role as a transit country for high risk trafficking routes. Moldova has established a national drug control committee to foster interagency coordination and align national efforts with international best practices. As the system for early warning on NPS is being developed, involving key institutions, such as the Medicines Agency, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Internal Affairs, with the support of international partners, including UNODC. The country actively participates in UNODC programs and working groups, including initiatives on drug demand reduction, prevention, and recidivism and access to vital health services for drug users. Moldova continues to promote alternatives to incarceration for personal drug use, emphasizing access to treatment, harm reduction, and social reintegration. Mr. Chair- the Republic of Moldova is proud to join the pledge for action initiative. As part of this commitment, we reaffirm our dedication in addressing the challenges outlined in the 2019 Ministerial Declaration. Moldova as a new EU candidate country recognizes the importance of strengthening cooperation and sharing expertise in the field of monitoring and responses. Priority areas include prevalence and patterns of drug use, capacity building efforts for professionals and stakeholders,  information sharing mechanisms on drugs, and international collaboration and partnership. Moldova expects to improve access to information, capacity to collect and analyze data, capacity to develop strategic analysis and preparedness to respond to emerging drug related, health, and security threats. However the country faces challenges such as the increased use of NPS, the emergence of online drug markets, and the fact that it serves as a transit center for high risk drug trafficking.  To develop alternatives to imprisonment for the possession of drugs for personal use, the main objective is to facilitate access to treatment and return to a healthy life in society based on respect for human dignity,  freedom, democracy, equality, solidarity, the rule of law, and human rights. If proposed to a comprehensive, interdisciplinary and balanced approach to drug issues based on integrated and evidence based collaboration, involving interdisciplinary and interministerial participation utilizing the results of implementation of the previous policy documents. The three main components on the modern drug policy which complement each other are as follows: drug demand and reduction, drug supply reduction, and risk assessment. The Republic of Moldova is prepared to cooperate with international and regional actors to improve drug monitoring and response systems and to contribute to wider efforts to reduce drug related harm. Mr. Chair- Moldova remains steadfast in its commitment to international cooperation and evidence based policy making. By aligning with the principles of the three drug control conventions and joing the pledge for action initiative, we reaffirm our determination to create safer and healthier communities.

Ghana: Mr. Chair, I will now provide an update on progress Ghana has made regarding commitments pledged. Ghana is taking significant steps in addressing harm reduction by formalizing its approach to minimize harm and promote public health. Ghana has finalized a draft  Harm Reduction Regulation and submitted for review by office of the [x] department and the  ministry of justice with the aim of obtaining parliamentary approval. Ghana has commenced with the development of a policy framework for creating a fund for substance use rehabilitation. To increase access and availability of controlled medicine, while preventing diversion and nonmedical use, Ghana has collaborated with other countries to share intelligence and resources to prevent the illicit trade and diversion of controlled medicines. We have also implemented electronic prescription systems and patient registries to monitor the use of controlled medicines. Thank you.

Chair:. I am quite disappointed that we’ve not had as many pledges or accountability of pledges at this time. In November on 12-14 we had more and so we should keep momentum on accounting. If we do not do this, we might forget about them and we’ll lose track of the burden we’ve [x] which is in the interest of humanity. I now open the floor to interventions

Armenia: I will now fill in the gap on the progress on the pledges. With the view of enhancing the implementation of all drug policy commitments as underlined in 2019 Ministerial Declaration and in response to your Chair’s pledge for action initiative, within the midterm review during the 67th session, Armenia pledged to develop a national strategy to combat drug abuse and illegal drug trafficking in Armenia. And now I’m pleased to inform that Armenia has already fulfilled its pledge by concluding the development of the national strategy as well as its action plan for 2025-2027. This draft strategy and action plan were developed after months of discussions and collaborations with the health and law enforcement sectors, as well as civil society. The document put emphasis on addressing the record level of illegal drug trafficking worldwide, as well as destructive consequences of drug use on public health. The draft strategy and action plan include numerous direction of activities and state interventions in two main fields: preventing and combating drug use and abuse among different social groups and illegal drug trafficking in general, as well as restoring human and public health, treating drug addictions and health issues connected to it, reintegrating persons treated into the society. The government of Armenia is grateful for the valuable support to the process provided by the UNODC, particularly for the timely review and evaluation of the mentioned documents and presented recommendations, which were all taken into account. This process was crucial for ensuring compliance with the strategy with international standards. Armenia remains committed to ensuring an effective drug control regime in line with the three international conventions and as member of CND will full engage in the [x] of its mandate. I thank you.

Turkey: Turkey is fully committed to the three international drug control conventions. Their full and universal implementation continues to be crucial for the effectiveness of the system. The CND as the primary policy making body and the UNODC as a leading entity for international drug policies should continue to steer our efforts. We also attach utmost importance to the INCB’s vital work in these efforts. Despite ongoing global efforts, the world drug problem is growing ever more complex. About 300 million people are estimated to use drugs around the world, facing the complexity of the illicit supply chains, such as rapidly shifting in trafficking routes, methods, diversifying range of drugs. The nexus between drug trafficking and other crimes, effective international cooperation is highly important for contributing to the functioning and development of the global drug control system. As agreed in the outcome document of the high level segment of the CND, we must promote tangible and efficient measures to this end. Mr. Chair, Turkey contributes to the International efforts and offers assistance to many countries in their capacity building efforts as we also pledged during the CND this year. Between 2018-2024 43 international operations were conducted by the Turkish National Police, counternarcotics department, with the cooperation of 24 countries. Turkish International Academy Against Drugs and Organized Crime and Turkish Counternarcotics Academy both aim to contribute to the capacity of other national and international law enforcement agencies. Since the establishment of NEA, 1816  law enforcement officers from 52 countries have been trained within [x] training programs. Turkey monitoring center for drugs and drug addiction  has been established as a national focal point of EU drug agency, with the aim of monitoring drug use, as well as the supply and demand side of drugs and reporting the data to YUDA, UNODC, and INCB. Our authorities also work close cooperation with Interpol and [x]. An early warning system national working group is also established to identify and assess new drugs.  From 2008- the present a total 1,061 NPS have been included in the related law on control of narcotic substances. We’re also hosting the UNODC’s Regional Office for South Eastern- ROSE in Istanbul. ROSE provides support and expertise on drugs, crime, corruption, criminal justice, and terrorism to countries across South Eastern Europe.  Mr. Chair, we’re witnessing with growing concern,  the dangerous trend of the normalization of drug abuse. Turkey believes that one of the biggest challenges in implementation of the conventions today is the legalization of drugs, especially cannabis. Cannabis continues to be the most used and its use is increasing. It is concerning that an increasing number of countries are liberating cannabis and cannabis related substances. Planting cannabis considered by the [x] terrorist organization the most lucrative activity in this field. The revenue being generated from drug trafficking has become a primary source of terrorism financing. The nexus between drug trafficking and terrorism is an important aspect in dealing with this phenomena. Turkey strongly supports the international cooperation efforts that have to focus on this nexus with terrorism. There is solid evidence that the PKK, PYPDJ has an established infrastructure and network to produce, transport, and traffic synthetic drugs throughout Europe. The designation of PKK ringleaders as drug traffickers by the Office of Foreign Stats Control of the United States Treasury Department is another testimony to the PKK’s drug trafficking activities.  In addition the latest report of the EuroPol also points out the PKK’s financing activities through drug trafficking in Europe. We deem information sharing essential in our collective fight against drug trafficking. Mr. Chair last but not least, I would like to mention the situation in Gaza. While we gather here to discuss how to promote and protect health, safety, and well being of humanity, collective punishment and suffering of the Palestinian people continue. 2.3 million people in Gaza, including women, children, elderly, civilians are under Israeli blockade and left alone with hunger, deprivation, and death.  Without a ceasefire it does not seem feasible to address the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza and also the threat of regional spill over will not subside. An immediate and comprehensive ceasefire, withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, release of hostages, detainees, and unhindered humanitarian access to Gaza will be the basis of an agreement. The UN Security Council must take due course measures against Israeli aggression. We believe that those who have committed crimes in Gaza must be brought to justice. On 7th August we submitted our declaration of intervention in the case brought forth by South Africa against Israel before the International Court of Justice.  The key to the lasting settlement of the conflict is the establishment of a sovereign, independent and contiguous Palestinian state, with East Jerusalem as its capital, based on the 1967 borders. Mr. Chair, we invite all countries to abide by their obligations arising from the drug control convention. This is our common and shared responsibility.

Bolivia: The delegation of the plurinational state of Bolivia would like to reaffirm its commitment to the Ministerial Declaration adopted in 2019. As we are aware, according the UNODC, the unprecedented levels cultivation, production, illicit trafficking of drugs are a serious threat to security, health, and wellbeing of communities. Nevertheless, the consumption of drugs is expanding, driven by multiple factors, such as urbanization, demographic changes, including a growth in the youth population,  and social and economic inequalities. It is also more difficult to reduce the supply of drugs due to the fact the illicit markets are ever more complex. Bolivia believes  it’s timely to address this item as part of the midterm review this year, on the way to implementing all the international commitments undertaken in terms of drug policy towards 2029. In this context, one which that stands out is the impotence of making progress on policy discussions to do with drugs policy and the link between the problem of drugs and transnational organized crime,  including cyber crime, illicit trafficking, and terrorism. But we’d also like to particularly underscore the need to ensure financing and cooperation. We must counter the world drug problem based on a human rights based approach, ensuring that these rights can be enjoyed, including at the highest level possible of physical and mental health and integrated approach to drug policies based on public health, human rights, justice, and law enforcement needs to place human dignity, human rights, and sustainable development at the center of responses to the drugs problem. My delegation believes one thing that is crucial to mention is the omnibus resolution to address and counter the world drug problem, adopted recently at the UNGA. This resolution promoted by the delegation of Mexico and my country cosponsored it is an effort reflect international cooperation to recognize the need to  address its causes and consequences, in line with the principle of common and shared responsibility. It also seeks to promote measures which guarantee access to substances subject to control for medical and scientific purposes in the framework of national, legal frameworks. Moreover, this resolution reaffirms the rights of Indigenous peoples to their own traditional medicines, an to maintaining their own health practices, including the conservation of their plants. So guaranteeing that the measures which are adopted to prevent the illicit cultivation of plants which contain psychotropic substances and eradicating them respect human rights and dully take into account the licit, traditional uses when there’s historic data indicating such use. Finally, we would like to thank this commission for its work focusing on contributing to the work of the ECOSOC Council and towards achieving the SDG’s, namely  SDG 3 and 16 of the 2030 Agenda. Thank you

Indonesia: For Indonesia, the 2019 Ministerial Declaration forms the basis for action through policy, balance, and cooperation. For implementation, ensuring accountability in encountering world drug problem. Indonesia’s are aligned with the SDG’s  in tune with the UNODC central role of overseeing our collective efforts. However, more can be done. First we need an early warning system that is globally reliable. Indonesia has established the NPS early warning system collectively [x] of various national services such as the health ministry, national police, customs, food and drug administration, and national narcotic board put together an interactive database accessible through the internet. The national narcotic board website provides NPS classification, statistics and research outcomes. Enhancements are still needed, such as improvement, accessibility, graphic design,  content management and automatic art for NPS. Second Indonesia has been offered [x] domestically in undertaking prevention efforts across government ministries and institutions. Evidence based programs, such as UNODC Family United were adopted and implemented. Third- Indonesia believes that [x] is an island and hence we must cooperate. We collaborate with stakeholders including government agencies and local communities, also play an active global role, embodying multilateralism engagements, strategies in countering the drug problem. Fourth- Indonesia [x] rehabilitation as a core mission. We take our responsibility to nurture victim back to health seriously. We incorporate the international standards for the treatment of drug use disorder into national standard.  We train and certify drug therapy and rehab personnel to ensure professionalism. We scale UNODC initiative to treat stimulant use disorder. We embrace community based intervention and we encourage drug therapy and rehabilitation services to be viewed as an integral element, along with mental health, HIV/AIDS, and Hep-C comorbidity services.

Ghana: Ghana is grateful to the Chair of the CND for his leadership qualities as well as to the Secretariat for the timely preparation for this meeting. Ghana acknowledges the progress made in recent years in the fight against drug trafficking, abuse, and related crimes and will remain fully committed to our shared responsibility of combating illicit drugs, promoting public health, and addressing security and associated socioeconomic challenges.  Mr. Chair, Ghana is a signatory to all the current international drug conventions and protocols. These conventions and joint our state parties to establish appropriate legal and [x] framework to deal with the drug [x] and provide a blueprint of measures for parties to follow. Ghana remains dedicated to adopting evidence-based, collective strategies, which prioritize health, human rights, sustainable development, international best practices at its core. The Narcotics Control Commission launched a national drug control master plan in 2022 as one of Ghana’s innovative responses to the growing drug situation. It is an expression of a firm commitment and determination to effectively and efficiently address the drug [x] in a period of 5 years. Despite significant progress made over the past years, we must not lose track of challenges, such as the [x] of transnational organized crime networks and addressing demands for illicit substances. There must be a multidisciplinary approach. Mr. Chair, Ghana believes that strengthening international cooperation and effective collaboration is an essential part of solving the drug problem. We are ready to enter new cooperations as well as solidify existing partnerships. We call for effective information sharing, capacity building, and mutual legal assistance, mainly with our neighbors and regional partners within the [x] region to strengthen law enforcement capabilities. It is my honor to inform you Mr. Chair, that at the last meeting of heads of national drug law enforcement agencies in Africa, held in Abuya, Ghana was elected to host the 32nd meeting, which is scheduled for September 2025. Ghana adheres to [x] the international drug control conventions, which forms the backbone of global efforts to control the accessibility and diversion of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. The narcotics control commission and the [x] drugs authority are the leading state agencies that regulate the importation, distribution, and use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances for medical, scientific, industrial purposes. On the international front, Ghana works closely with the INCB to monitor the use and availability of controlled substances. Again, Ghana works in close collaboration with its neighbors in the [x] region and other international partners to monitor and control cross border trafficking of narcotic drugs. I call for heightened collaboration in addressing [x] need for controlled substances and the threat of drug abuse and trafficking. In conclusion Mr. Chair, Ghana remains relentless in working closely with member states, UN agencies and regional bodies to address complex challenges posed by narcotic drugs. It is only through collective action, solidarity, and a balanced approach that we can make meaningful progress to a drug free world.

Colombia: Colombia would like to make a call early on this Commission. It is crucial for the evaluation process both in the thematic discussions which we will hold right up into 2028, as well as subsequent dialogues to be held in a critical spirit. The discussions should not be seen as a scenario or seen to defend at any cost a dogma or the world drug situation. But should be seen as an opportunity to question and reflect on strategies and approaches. Let us not talk just one, two and at each other but to each other. Colombia does not have all the answers but I would like to request you to address these discussions based on a certain recognition that as things are going, they are going badly. Please understand that we will not continue to sacrifice our lives, our environment, and our development for a global drug policy which has failed. Colombia has lost fear and you should lose it too with us to ensure we can make progress together.

Malaysia: My delegation reaffirms its commitment to the principles outline in the  Ministerial Declaration of 2019 which emphasizes a comprehensive and balanced approach to addressing the world drug problem. The challenges posed by such problem require concentrated efforts at national, regional, and international levels. In line with our pledge made during the high level segment of the 67th session of the CND in March of this year, we [x] dedicated to enhancing international and regional cooperation in countering the world drug problem. Our entire drug strategy plan 2021-25 served as a framework for actions consistent with our international and regional treaty obligations. This year Malyasia in collaboration with UNODC has organized the [x]  symposium on drugs, treatment issues, and challenges- what’s next 1-3 October. The symposium was attended by officials from Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand, and Vietnam, as well as the United Kingdom. The symposium provided the avenue for sharing knowledge in terms of treatment of drug addicts in prison, raising awareness on reducing social stigma,  and building cooperation among Asian member states. Malaysia remains active in enhancing  bilateral cooperation, especially with out neighboring countries, such as Singapore, through a Memorandum of Understanding, our bilageral arrangements complementing existing Asian frameworks, including the Asian Ministerial Meeting on Drug Matters and the Asia Seaport and Airport Interdiction Task forces to combat synthetic drug trafficking by maritime and air routes. Mr. Chair- Malaysia will continue to strengthen partnerships with other nations and international organizations to disrupt the illicit manufacture, production, trafficking and distribution of drugs, mindful that collaboration is key to combating drug related crimes. Malaysia stands firm in its resolve to implement the commitments in the 2019 Ministerial Declaration. We are dedicated to fostering a safer and healthier society, with the goal of promoting a society free of drug abuse and society free from the harms of drug abuse and trafficking. True collaborative and innovative strategies that reflect our shared responsibility in the global fight against the world drug problem.

Nigeria: Despite all the efforts [x] achieved in  addressing the world drug problem, trafficking drug networks are intersecting global crisis and challenges health services.  Cheap and easy synthetics are changing drug markets with [x] results. Drug use disorders are harming health, including mental health, safety, and wellbeing, while the harms caused by drug trafficking and illicit drug economies are contributing to these many threats from instability, violence, to environmental devastation. Young people are using drugs more than previous generations and the majority of people being treated for drug use disorders are under the age of 35. What this shows is that the availability of treatment has not kept pace with these development. Women in particular, suffer from treatment gaps. The world drug problem in all its forms and manifestations affects all of us and the stakes are especially high for Africa. No one country can tackle a problem of this matter alone, just as well  the world drug problem cannot only be tackled solely through international drug policy making. It requires effective implementation and collaboration among practitioners. We underscore the need for national, regional and international collaborations to reach toward addressing and countering the world drug problem. It is in the light that Nigeria has continued to leverage partnership and support of the UNODC at addressing the challenges of the world drug problem. At the national level, Nigeria has strengthened cooperation and coordination among relevant national authorities dealing with drug challenges. An Inter Ministerial Committee on Drug Control has since been established to ensure seamless coordination on all issues related to drug control at the national level. Similarly, sub-control committees have been set up at the subnational level. These groups meet regularly to evaluate the implementation of drug control policies, and develop strategies to strengthen daily drug control activities. They ar both approaches adopted in the national drug control masterplan, which combines law enforcement and the promotion of public health, while employing interagency collaboration and global cooperation in countering the world drug problem. Nigeria has continued to [x] of this document to advance the counter narcotic campaign. The interest in [x] in the national drug control master plan is the inclusiveness and shared responsibility to work together towards the objective of the plan. The four strategy pillars of the plan are drug supply reduction, drug demand reduction, access to controlled medication for medical and scientific purposes,  governance, and coordination. We believe the combination of these pillars is the best approach towards addressing the challenges of drug abuse and illicit trafficking of drugs.  Nigeria will continue to initiate, deepen, and support profitable collaboration, even as you call for a international collaboration in the implementation of our commitments to  address the links between drug trafficking, terrorism, [x], [x],  smuggling of migrants, and other forms of organized crime. Thank you

United States The US welcomes this term’s midterm review. Domestically the United States is working to address the deadliest drug threat in our history via a two-pronged approach to protect against overdoses and reduce demand for drugs, including by preventing drug use before it starts, saving lives, and supporting people in recovery, and to dismantle the supply chains of illicit drugs, including a  crack down on the global criminal networks fueling fatal and nonfatal overdoses. These two lines of efforts reflect the balanced approach we talk about here in Vienna and the US pursues both to bring about meaningful and lasting change. I’d like to highlight how Secretary Blinken and his senior leadership have traveled throughout the US to meet with local authorities to ensure  that our work abroad is informed by the situation at home. These visits have afforded the opportunities to assist local communities in their fight against the harmful effects of synthetic drugs. For example, sharing the latest trends in NPS, such as xylazine and nitazenes, or forging a connection with international networks of prevention experts or treatment providers. Regionally, we would also like to also applaud the work of the Organization of American States Inter American drug control commission, which hosted its 76th session two weeks ago. The OAS held four days of spirited and engaging discussions on topics ranging from overdose prevention and recovery, to law enforcement measures against gangs, and criminal networks. The United States is proud to collaborate with our partners in the Hemisphere to address our regional challenges. Globally the United States has worked with 163 countries, 15 international organizations, and with input from civil society to establish and drive the global coalition to address synthetic drug threats, with the aim of galvanizing attention to global shifts occurring in the illicit drug markets  and to mobilize a coordinated international response to address the production, transit, and consumption of illicit drugs. Since its launch in 2023, the coalition has doubled in numbers with working groups and sub-working groups meeting regularly to exchange data and best practices. These meetings informed 68 recommendations for concrete actions governments can take across all three lines of effort to effectively address the public and health safety threats posed by synthetic drugs, as well as their impact on national economies and citizen security. The working group has also identified over 120 existing initiatives that can directly support governments interested in implementing these recommendations. Year 2 of the Coalition is devoted to action. We need to continue to work together. Governments, international organizations, the private sector, civil society and others to reduce the areas of vulnerabilities that drug trafficking organizations look to exploit and to provide people with substance use disorders with the support and the care that they need. I welcome all interested countries to contact my delegation for additional information on Coalition’s work.

Pakistan: Acknowledging your requests for more countries to provide updates on pledges, we have on sharp notice made this update on the pledges made by Pakistan earlier this year. our country Regarding the establishment of a counternarcotics center, appropriate infrastructure has been allocated towards the anti-narcotic headquarters for the envisioned fusion center. Procurement of necessary equipment are furnishing are being initiated by UNODC and this selection process for the [x] is currently underway. For the establishment of the model addiction, treatment,  rehabilitation reintegration center, suitable land has been identified and its procurement from the provincial government is in process. Once the land transfer is completed, a formal project agreement will be signed with our partner USINL to proceed with the establishment of the center. The third pledge was to strengthen our our interdiction efforts. Pakistan has established two police stations in strategic locations in the province of Bolojistan on temporary infrastructure. Efforts are underway to engage international partners for the development of permanent infrastructure at these locations as well. We remain committed to fulfilling these pledges as part of our broader efforts to combat drug abuse and trafficking and we will continue to provide updates on their progress.

Morocco: As a contribution to the initiative pledge for action aimed at mobilizing member states commitment towards concrete and impactful actions [x] aimed at the world drug problem. As outlined in the 2019 Ministerial Declaration, the Kingdom of Morocco pledged to share its own experience in preventing and combating the world drug problem with African countries. In this regards, I’m pleased to inform that the relevant [x] authorities have continued their efforts to strengthen the capacities of African countries by organizing training seminars relating to the different facets of the world drug problem, particularly in the field of investigation techniques and tools, technical and scientific, police and criminal intelligence. Indeed, training centers of [x] trained between 2023-2024 222 officers from 16 African countries. Morocco provided also last year, training in scientific investigation for the benefit of 21 trainees from many African countries. In the same way, Morocco also continued exchange with African states in reports and analysis, as well as  operational intelligence information, collected on members of criminal networks operated between Morocco and African countries throughout the adequate channels. The Ministry of Health is also developing a program aimed at sharing Morocco’s experience with African countries in the field of developing and implementing health and social responses to the world drug problem.

Mexico: The delegation of Mexico would like to join its voice to others who have expressed with solid arguments. I’m speaking here about the delegations of Bolivia and Colombia. We would like to add three additional points to the debate. The first one of those is that we have sought to look into the background as to how coca leaf ended up scheduled in schedule 1 of the convention and it seems to us that it might seem strange but there is no scientific basis backing up this original scheduling. The second point is that anyone who’s seen the way of life and the way in which Indigenous communities live in the societies of the Andean countries, will know that the coca leaf has a traditional use and a use which is totally different from what is covered under the convention; the two things are not connected. And the third thing- just due to this decision of the coca leaf having been scheduled in schedule 1 of the convention, these Indigenous communities from the Andean region have seen their way of life affected. They have seen themselves subjected to stigma attached to their culture, which needs to be remediated. My final point chair is that every time that this commission meets, every time that the INCB works, they add substances to the schedules and the various schedules under the convention, with good reason, but I think it’s also fair for us to reflect together and look at whether or not there’s a need to do justice sometimes. Sometimes, we should not just add things but remove things too and I think for this case it’s the removal of the coca leaf from schedule 1 of the convention. Thank you.

Chair: No more speakers on my list. I just want to say a few words before we proceed. The world drug problem is a huge challenge for all countries. No country is immune. It has far reaching ramifications, which affect future generations. And its negative ramifications [x]. There’s no one all solution fix to this problem. We cannot work individually to achieve success- that should be clear to all of us. We need to continue dialogue. We ought to harness our diversity of views and through dialogue, we will be able to reach that fine line that will help us deal with this as holistically and comprehensively…and so we should not be tied in finding solutions but the solutions that we ought to find should be that which is deep in science, that which is in evidence, that which will save our people. We do not have to talk at each other. We need to talk to each other. And we have to give room to alternative points of views and we have to integrate those views carefully in arriving at evidence based decisions that will inform policy and action. And this is the only way from where I sit and what I’ve heard through others here and so, let us not be tied in seeking a way out of this problem. Because deciding to act alone and not together will bring a monumental failure to all of us. This is what I want to say for your contribution to this agenda item, which is not closed until tomorrow morning. We will now open Agenda item 10 entitled provisional agenda for the 68th session agenda and agenda item 11 entitled other business today, or any other interventions from the floor. Under Agenda Item 10, I would like to find out from the floor if there are any interventions for Agenda item 10? I see no interventions. We will now move onto Agenda Item 11, entitled other business. A draft decision has been tabled by Poland on behalf of the states members of the EU, entitled “Participation by the EU in the work of the commission.” Before I ask the representative of the Russian Federation to take the floor, I would like to reiterate what I’ve said before. We’ve come that far in working together to achieve results in this [x]. That approach should be what we should adopt so that we carry each other together in dealing with common issues, rather than deciding to act independently, which would then break our foot in seeking consensus on the matters that are before us, that affects us all in very different ways. And do, I would appeal to us all to be constructive in deliberating on this subject that is before us. Poland you have the floor.

Poland: On behalf of the EU and its member states, have tabled a draft decision on the participation of the EU in the Commission. I would like to pass the floor to the Ambassador of EU to present this decision.

EU: Two of our member states Poland and Czechia have tabled respectively a draft decision on participation of the EU for consideration by the CND and CCPCJ at theis reconvened sessions, on behalf of the EU and its member states. The aim of these two texts is simple: to reaffirm the existing practice whereby the representatives of the EU may continue to participate, without the right to vote, in the work of the Commissions and be inscribed on the list of speakers in order to make interventions on behalf of the EU, including for opening remarks. Such opening marks have traditionally been delivered in the CND, CCPCJ, and in fact all UN fora by group representatives, where regional groups – the G77 and China, or the EU. The Secretariat may wish to confirm that this indeed has been the case. This practice is well established and has served us well in Vienna. It derives from the basic principle that it is a sovereign rights of each UN member state, each group, each organization to define the modalities of its external representation.  Our aim is not to change anyone’s speaking rights or set precedence for other fora. It is simply to maintain the existing practice in the CND and CCPCJ. In the case of the EU, EU member states have entrusted the external representation of the EU to institutional representatives, such as the EU delegation in Vienna. After entry into force of Lisbon Treaty in 2009, we informed UNODC of these arrangements in writing in 2019 to make it clear to all. Since then, this has been the accepted practice and it’s worked well. However, since one UNODC member state has now explicitly challenged the status quo, we have no choice but to seek a written confirmation of the existing practice. This is indispensable so that the EU can continue to participate in the work of the CND and CCPCJ and present positions of the EU and its member states that is agreed by them. This includes statements at the Plenary and interventions in the Committee of the Whole, and informals, similar to past CND and CCPCJ sessions, nothing less nothing more. During the informal consultations, we heard dozens delegations saying they support the current practice and do not wish to set precedent for other UN fora. The proposed amendment tabled by the Russian Federation would do the opposite. It would mark a significant change to the existing practice. Firstly, the amendment would remove the important reference to members of the extended bureau, whose role is recognized in ECOSOC resolution 2003/31.These include regional groups, the G77 and China, and the EU, who are inscribed on this list of speakers for opening marks reserved for members of the extended bureau. Secondly, the proposed amendments would create a new category of speaking rights for dozens of international organizations, without necessarily having a prior authorization from their members. This would clearly not serve the work of the CND but make it unworkable, unwieldy, and impossible to govern. It’s not up to the international organizations but their member states to divide about their external representation. Mr. Chair I would like to take this opportunity to thank you and all delegations for the constructive and productive discussions that have taken place over the past two weeks, helping us to improve our regional drafts. We have carefully listened to your suggestions and tried to incorporate them to the fullest extend possible, with the aim to achieve broad support. We have also consulted the Secretariat and through the Secretariat, the office of legal affairs and are utmost grateful for the valuable advice. We recall that most delegations that we spoke to during the informal consultations said they were not opposed to the current practice. Some asked if it would be necessary to put the practice in writing and what would be the most appropriate venue for doing so? From our perspective, putting the existing practice on paper is necessary now in order to bring certainty and continuity to our work before the next regular sessions of the CND and CCPCJ in Spring of next year. Let me conclude by saying that the EU has engaged in an open, inclusive, and transparent manner with all delegations on this issue. Our preference is to have this decision adopted in a smooth fashion. I would like to invite all delegations to study our text and if you are satisfied with the current practice, to support their adoption and oppose any amendment to the draft. Thank you.

Russia: The RF expressed its position with regard to the draft decisions it submitted earlier. The essence of our position is that such issues should be dealt by ECOSOC. Their consideration at the level of the Commission can lead to issues with the work of the function of the commissions. We would really be helped by an independent legal advice from New York and we do not wish to make or be hasty. We need to carefully consider everything. States during the consultation clearly indicated that they were not comfortable with adopting this decision. They proposed ideas, resolutions, and proposals on how to improve it. And the main message to the cosponsors was to take time to analyze and to discuss. Nevertheless the draft decision has been submitted and in this concern the RF has to make amendments- an amendment to the operational part of this draft about the participation of the EU in work of this Commission. We are proposing deleting at the end of the operational part of the text the words, “reserved for members of the Extended Bureau,” since that does not fully correspond to the existing practice in the Commissions. In accordance with the practice, “not all members of the extended bureau,” in particular the Vice-Chairs and Rapporteurs have to intervene at the closure of the session. And another important part in our view- our amendment does not pertain to the existing practice of the G77 with China at the beginning of the session, which we fully support. If there are any concerns, we can work on a text in order to ensure this is absolutely clear because we are all clearly intending to ensure  that the G77 in no way should lose anything and we believe that there’s a need to add at the of the operational draft the following phrase “and affirms that this practice should apply on an equal basis to other intergovernmental organizations, referred to in rule 74 in the Rules of Procedure of the Functional Commissions of the ECOSOC Council. We would suggest that this proposal reflects the intention which prevails in the commission and the intention is not to be confrontational and it should allow us to provide clarity about the rights and powers of observers of the Commission, who should have equal opportunities to participate in accordance with the work. Equal opportunities that’s the aim. I would like to note that during the informal consultations on the draft, the member states and delegations of the EU underscored themselves that they were not seeking to have any sort of exclusive or special rights. They recognized the fact that there’s other intergovernmental organizations mentioned in the rules of procedure of the functional commissions which have similar powers and that’s what behind our proposals- aimed at setting this understanding in the text of the draft. And once again this draft has been submitted and the issue of whether or not it’s going to be withdrawn or amended is not resolved. Our amendment is not aiming to prevent the participation of any group in the sessions. But if they have a certain interest, then this opportunity will be given to them on equal footing with the EU. I would like to repeat that that is the aim and the spirit of the proposed wording. Now it can be worked on to some extent. It can be improved but  it’s aimed at promoting equality since we are on the path towards working on the text. The RF stands ready to address other scenarios, thank you.

Chair: The signals i get from your last statement, is that there is room for work on the decision that is before and that  we can do work so that we agree on that decision. There’s a request for clarification. First and foremost, I would want to find out from Poland whether you think you could still work on the draft decision so that we come out with a consensus decision from this point?

Poland: First we would like to see the Russian proposal, we would like to see the document, amended with the new Russian proposal before we can start a discussion on the new proposal. Because the Russian delegate said they would want to delete a part of the text. I would like to see the new wording of this paragraph.

Chair: I will ask a follow up question. Would you like to work together on the text of the amendments so that we can come back with some kind of common text? It’s not 5:44 Should I give the delegations 10 minutes to consider working on the part of the decision?

Poland: Could you give us five minutes to discuss among out member states to discuss the issue?

Chair: You have ten minutes.

Chair: We have not been able to resolve the matter that caused us to suspend our meeting and so we would like to bring our proceedings today to some closure. But before doing that, there were two delegations that wanted to take the floor under Rule 45 on the Rules of Procedure. Are there other delegations still with us in the room? First Israel, you have 2minutes.

Israel: We wish to express our ongoing concern regarding the direction of discussion. Similar to the morning session, it appears that some delegations are using this platform to further their political agenda which contributes to the spread of disinformation. We have also observed that these allegations choose to adopt a constructive stance on [x] lines with their interests in areas such as technical assistance, capacity building, and international cooperation, topics where they express the resources they currently lack. In light of this, I would like to reiterate the situation concerning the 100 hostages still being tortured and abused, deprived of fundamental human rights for the past 426 days. While we are committed to bringing our people back, we are also facing challenges in multiple fronts, including here, which do not contribute to the welfare of Gazans. We believe it’s vital to condemn the actions of Hamas, which obstruct humanitarian aid from reaching those in need. Further than condemning the actions of Hamas, specifically the use of civilian as  human shields while obstructing the delivery of humanitarian aid. We urge the international community to exert pressure to cease the attacks on Israel. Such actions not only inflicts harm on our people but also destabilize the broader region of the Middle East. Israel has the right and duty to defend itself and its citizens.

United States: We exercised the right of reply this morning and we thought that we thought that would be sufficient. So let’s just say we’re disappointed that this fora is again being used for political issues that are diverting us from our real focus. We simply want to restate what we said this earlier morning and if that could just be reflected in the record so that we don’t have to restate it. While I have the floor, before we embark tomorrow, considering the issues before us, can we ask the Secretariat if they can provide us information on what the practical applications would be if either of the decisions were made, specifically the amendments made by Russia. It seems to us that as a practical matter, we would end up with something like 200 international organizations entitled to speak before our ministers would be able to speak and we just wonder, as a practical matter, whether this is workable.

Chair: The decision before us has been discussed. We have not come to any firm conclusion and until that is done, we will not be able to give you any information. The Secretariat will not be able to anticipate how the wording will be. Until that is done,  we will not be able to but I understand what you’re saying and it’s justified. It’s a reasonable request to make, so let’s see how it goes tomorrow. On this note, I want to thank you for your cooperation. We will adjourn our meeting now and resume tomorrow at 10am. The meeting is adjourned.