Poland fully supports the statement made by Latvia on behalf of the EU, however, we would like to add some words of reflection. We have been witnessing innovative, radical, and controversial approaches. The surge for rational and modern solutions revolves around the national level, leaving the global level behind. The rising pressure of civil society …
Poland
CND Intersessional – Friday 6th March 2015
Chair – Thailand: Today we hope to discuss draft resolutions and in the afternoon, scheduling. Also on the agenda are preparations for CND and the UNGASS segment next week. On the UNGASS segment, the schedule has been revised so that on Tuesday 10 March, segment B will be in the morning and segment A in …
CND Inter-Sessional Session to discuss preparations for the UNGASS 2016 – 4 September 2014
MORNING SESSION Click here to view the presentations on UNGASS 2016. Chair (Ambassador Khaled Shamaa, Egypt): Began by introducing various procedural matters, and the agenda for the day was adopted. It is expected that UN General Assembly will adopt the UNGASS preparations resolution at their 69th Session. The Chair also encouraged Member States to invite civil society organisations …
High Level Segment – Government of Poland Statement
Statement by Mr. Piotr Jabłoński Director of the National Bureau for Drug Prevention, on the occasion of the High-Level Segment of 57th Session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs Vienna, 13-14 March 2014 Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen, Poland subscribes fully to the statement presented earlier yesterday on behalf of the European Union, however, I …
Thursday morning Plenary Statement by Poland
Poland. Condemns lack of will to eliminate capital punishment. Advocates protection of rights of psychoactive substance users. Using drugs is defined as a complex phenomenon. In recent years, concerted efforts to prevent by means alternative to penal systems. Balance between drug demand and supply reduction has given way to evidence based treatment programs. A great …
Round Table A: Statement from Poland
Poland is a transhipment country. My question is: who is responsible for this situation? Is it only one country in Asia? We should start our consideration of shared possibility on a single question: evidence based policy, and consider our country to cause problem for other countries in a particular region. We need to harmonise better …